Search results

Righto, having put on my glasses and read the rules of conduct i believe I've found the reference the moderator was referring to: 9. CONTRIBUTE [...] (a) Posts discussing rumors or misinformation, including the posting of rumors and/or personal opinion as fact, are not allowed. (b) Posts...

Puts on Spectrum hat Apologies, I've missed something here haven't I? I've taken another look at the screenshot of your original post and can't see where they started we can't discuss bad business practices. If we are not, I wouldn't be able to discuss the heinous Lootbox "surprise mechanics"...

But which are you? The hammer, the nail, the fly or the painting? And What does the unwilling witness to all this, the wall make of it? Take a look at your original lines quoted by the moderator through each of those filters. What do your quoted words actually say in each of those contexts...

Cheers, it's difficult to know what is/isn't actual in something like the internet which doesn't exist in any form you can physically interact with it anyway. It's just a load of computers beeping at each other and the only reason it works is they all agree what the beeps mean.

Totally get where you are coming from. There is intention, there is reality, and when intention is communicated before the reality is clear, interpretation of that intention can only ever set up for disappointment through the filter of executed reality. Added to that there is always two...

Yes, the "being dishonest about it" makes the whole statement an absolute by association regardless of the "Seems" and even that may have needed more effort... Outright making it a personal observation perhaps go as far as saying "I've interepreted X as Z, have I got this wrong?" may be able to...

I think the issue with the post is stating that dishonesty has occurred: "CIG being dishonest". We only have what the official statements on the situation and those statements make the situation quite clear. I'd be willing to change my stance on the issue if anyone provided any proof, but to...

It's easy to rig a website to say what you want with an F12 edit: Not saying it happened on this occasion but beware reports from across the interewebz, @Drowez did you see this yourself or was it a report from elsewhere?

That's reet shiny, congratulations if it is a recent acquisition.

Finally my tax is actually being spent on something.

Ohhh, blimey yeah I think I remember... Man I'm gettin' old.

Cheers you two, I have absolutely no memory of smaller stations - I know they added elevators for the Cargo decks and stuff which ballooned some of them but can't recall... I like Long Forest and Faint Glen, they are both quite self contained, were the old rest stops like those...?

Was that when the Cry-Astro was replaced with the R&R? Because I'm pretty sure it was to introduce hangars, interiors, shops and food access points, spawn points etc...? Super interesting though, can you link us to the statement it was purely for aesthetics?

Welcome back ColdDog, I'd rather you don't go away again so I 'ain't saying nothing! :-D

Just don't tell ADI that.

If they were in Derby which was the only other UK office as far as I am aware, that was the previous Mo-Cap dept if I remember correctly.

Watched, all I can remember is something about DMing boobs to people.

Thank you, Glorious Leader! (now I've got to go watch the video)

Thank you, Glorious Leader!

Heh, it will be interesting to see the 21 extending ship salute.