Search results

I never did understand what they expect these websites to do. It's not like they are the publisher of information and are truly just a public forum where people can go and voice whatever they feel like. Or is it no longer valid to expect people to use their best judgment? It's also a weird...

A good video. Only a few technical flaws but I feel for the most part it's correct enough for people to catch the general concept.

The entire industry has not moved away from heavy death penalties and full loot. We have to look no further than Escape from Tarkov which has a growing gamer base. Even games like Rust and Ark showed a large gamer base and while they had issues were still a lot of fun to play. To say that...

They have already addressed the features going from bit by bit to full feature release. They even reiterated it in All About Alpha 3.15 as Rich Tyrer is shifting over to SQ42 but still has projects in the Verse, as well as projects with in the next patch or two, will continue to be tier 0...

Large, please.

wait it wasn't from the start?

I don't see why they can't enable stealing from vendors or players and I am sure it should incur the same penalties depending on the jurisdiction bylaws. Just like mugging or murdering will have its own penalties and then the looting of said victim might include further crimes. I guess what...

I have a feeling that most of CIG's resources are dedicated to completing SQ42. I also know that most computer game companies have very few programmers as most of their staff needs are with art assets and designers putting together the game world. Of the few programmers most will be tied up...

grandpa that carrack is so dated.

hopefuly it will be finished.

I thought about it but realized that I've always disliked seeing an NPC/Player with an item that looks intriguing work at taking them out then go to loot them only to find that you cant acquire it. I think the better solution is to simply make it so that the purchased item is lootable. That...

Not a bad idea, the only issue I have with it is how are you going to keep the ship you're not currently on from despawning? We know that ships attached to other ships will not despawn until the parent ship despawns. But what is not clear is how other ships will act when no player is aboard...

No, I do not think they will push the issue. This gets sticky but honestly, you are not entitled to your ship. It was a gift for backing the project, not a purchased item so as much as we complain about it and feel like we can sue it once again falls into the ToS and all the other agreements...

Same. But so far I have not seen any evidence of CIG saying that there is any sort of permanent loss in fact as I linked in the video Rich clearly said that there is no intention of permanent loss they fully want players to get back their lost items they just don't know by what game mechanic...

What I don't understand is why the youtube channel doesn't also have 20k subscribers.

All ships are homed at the spawn location. That means if you pick a home location that does not have a ground vehicle spawn point then you would not be able to access those items. (you can always reset your account and pick a different home spawn location) Items rented for now seem to be...

So I finally got time to start watching the Star Citizen Live with Rich Tyrer and he said what I was expecting. For 3.15 they currently do not have a means to recover non-ship-based account items. These items are not removed from your account just not available to you in-game unless you reset...

Was this made clear in the All About Alpha 3.15?

Testing testing. Is this thing still on?

While it is possible to lose non-ship account items currently unless you reset your account they have stated several times that it's not their intention and they intend to allow for ways to recover these items. It's just in the current game state without resetting your account there is no way...