Search results

Well you can at least hold the decision until the carrack is in garage!

Well the terrapin covered my exploration gap but it is not cheap still used credits. Also got an upgrade to the carrack from the blade but I am not sure I will use it at least its choices.

No why go to so much trouble to tart up the ugly "Van". I bet you people own beetles in real life.

Well for the terripin impatient you will have to wait all day for more details!!! Whatever else can be said about star citizen they do a good job at selling pixel ships!

Uber impatient and star citizen backer are a causality failure, they should not exist in the same space.

Well it was explorer/miner in the concept vote but a miner really seems redundant unless they just want more mining ships, I definitely do not need another prospector. A small salvage ship makes sense though since we do not have one and explorer is well covered.

I am not saying your wrong, just drawing the distinction between S42 i.e. linear story arc game and the open PU.

Oh do not get me wrong, the current graphics would blow on a console, but the key to any game being fun is thankfully more about gameplay. You can tune graphics down easy enough.

Well I ticked " up to $150 million" since we are already "up to $150 million" I cannot loose unless we get over 150 million! Okay so I need a beer what can I say. Lets be honest if they want to maximise profits for SQ42 it should be available on consoles just for the much bigger audience. I am...

I can see no harm adding one as a buy back option but in reality if your ship can land on its own already I cannot see the use. I already have a couple of small haulers i.e. cutlass blue and hull b. Still since they made it I can see no harm in them selling it.

Some days it is just sunny!

Hello Kitty definitely beats the standard yellow where can my butch "pirate" (drake ship owner so same thing) get that?

I tried to rewatch this recently, whilst I loved it the first time through sadly time has moved on for me! Can sadly say the same for the water margin. Monkey is just as funny though.

I am surprised by that double up to be honest as they seem to have exactly the same roles the same options and nearly the same crews. On the other hand if you got rid of one what would you get instead. The thing about the DUR is surely you have combat covered as well!

I am somewhat surprised people still read gaming magazines, heh what do you know! It is kind of fair enough to try and increase publicity and free marketing is free marketing. As far as funding it does seem like we are all (okay not quite all) addictive gamblers who cannot help ourselves and...

Sq42 is a good example though of expanding the scope of the "Goals", there was also the perhaps ill fated star marine as well. Neither of which would seem to allow you to fly your space fleet from which you they have been funded. Anyways still fingers crossed.

The cost of lawyers being what it is, I am sure it was easier for them to just pay him. To be honest the game seems a very long way from any release and people are not patient by and large. I like some aspects of the game (not really a FPS player for instance) and It does seem like the goals...

Me to but lets be honest, after a certain amount of spending an extra ship doesn't add much both to the hanger or the total cost! I am still waiting to see how much the caterpillar modules cost and hope its before a possible gamescon sale. (I still have credits!).

I did complete the survey but it is not easy to answer because I do not know how literally most of the game mechanics will actually be. I do have ships for most purposes (never mind the almost unlimited scope to change them). I do suspect that if one area of the game is much more fun to do than...

There is a certain satisfaction to be had for playing exactly the same game at a fraction of the cost, rock on your Aurora. Most folks would call that a bargain!