Search results

Is this some kind of British term for "I look a bit like Vavrik did several weeks(tm) ago? If so, I have a solution for that which doesn't involve duct tape.

This is what it's doing as of yesterday. As you said, UK is not reporting every day. Some others if you look at it do the same. Data is normalized per 1 million population. Scroll down. Source for the chart is Our World in Data. Link below. Data comes from John Hopkins University...

I'm not sure what part is the government's fault, but they certainly need to stop Johnsoning it all up. But honestly I don't think it's all that bad. It's certainly not good. It's just that the data shows people getting sick, and some even going to hospital - but they don't seem to be dying...

I remember back when the RSI website was confusing. It was yesterday.

You didn't do anything. It was a scene at the end of the video @Blind Owl posted above my post. and Welcome Home!

Just adding to your excellent responses. JWST took 12.5 hours to take the deep field image. https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddard/2022/nasa-s-webb-delivers-deepest-infrared-image-of-universe-yet Also, note that JWST was not focused at 13.1 billion light years, but 4.6 billion light years...

Experiment time! Well at least when the Hull E comes out.

try it. the results are - spectacular, but not a crash.

lol, I am not wearing my glasses, so I read that "I am a general dog" at first... then it came into focus.

You know, I really like how you respect and even support other orgs in your video's. That says a lot.

Last December, the first time I caught COVID, I had a low grade fever with a small amount of coughing for about 3 hours. This was followed a few days later by constant coughing, a horse voice, asthma attacks every ~ 30 minutes, and I developed a problem staying awake for more than 6 hours at a...

Something interesting, on GitHub for all to enjoy. It's an interactive tool that allows you to do direct comparison between Hubble and Webb using the same images both took. Scroll down to see the choices. Have fun. https://johnedchristensen.github.io/WebbCompare/Deep_Field.html

It's weird how that helps, but whatever works! Good to see you found the forums.

Yeah but we're shit posting in a different thread at the moment. Just give us a moment or time to finish a beer so we can get better disorganized.. (note: there are apparently more ways to misspell shit posting than I previously knew.)

Look at all @Talonsbane's brothers and sisters rejoice! Glorious!

Do you realize you're actually making the case for what @NaffNaffBobFace said? Like are you trying to agree or just add more information? In the case of missing the role H. Pylori has in ulcers, for example, they had a single study that was not replicated, and made it dogma. Back then, that...

@NaffNaffBobFace, you cause me to laugh frequently, and your post here s not different. Also, in this sentence above, you have encapsulated one of the most important rules in any science, including computer science, information science, and data science.

@Bambooza actually said that. Anyhow, 13 billion light years is a good start. But the observable part of the universe is a sphere with a radius a bit over 46.5 billion light years. Just saying there is a lot more to see than what we've been shown so far.

It depends on which part of the image you're looking at. This, it might explain some of it. View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWjbGHb2ZC4&t=7s

That is perfect. We do need the studies, but it would be unethical to do anything but a retrospective study unless you consider people as lab rats. There are those that do, so don't wish it. Until we get retroactive studies, what we have is OSHA and FDA knowledge - which are both based on...