For price, doesn't it go: Leopard 2, Challenger 2, Abrams, LeClerc.... T-90?If that's the case i'm going to form an all brit wing of fighters and tell them what ships have tea :grin:
2017 Planned Development Schedule
- Thread starter Braxtin
- Start date
Hell yeah... But even an American Blue on Blue can't take one out....
Can't not have our tea...
Can't not have our tea...
Last edited:
I think the only tank ever to kill a Challenger 2 has been another Challenger 2. Though the Challenger 2 isn't out in combat often. The Abrams is out in combat a lot, ha. There are also many more Abrams in duty than Challenger 2s, which gives people many more targets.Hell yeah... But even an American Blue on Blue can't take one out....
Can't not have our tea...
Now, If I had to pick a tank so sit inside of while it was shot at, I'd go with the Challenger 2, mostly for the tea. The T-14 looks promissing though everyone is up front and I don't know how I'd feel sitting up there in a crowded tank. If a round went through the armor, it's almost certain that it would go through someone.... though I guess the molten metal following it would kill the other people inside, so I guess it doesn' matter.
Maybe I'd like to be in a Leopard 2 just to be in something made by people who I share ancesters with :)... Though I guess that would also include the T-14, but at a smaller percentage of my bloodline.
Which tank would I love to be in while firing? Abrams :)
I didn't think it was a kill just a disable?
The gun system with the Chally is definitely better than the Abrams as is the armour.
Therefore I stand by my Chally is better ;)
*Turret was destroyed two were killed, so I stand corrected... that sounds pretty fucked even if you could still drive it somewhere its definitely combat dead*
Last edited:
Abrams has those cancer shells made out of depleted Uranium. I'd want to fire those over the tungsten ones :)
I didn't think it was a kill just a disable?
The gun system with the Chally is definitely better than the Abrams as is the armour.
Therefore I stand by my Chally is better ;)
And last I heard in 2014 or so, 100 Abrams tanks were lost in the middle east but only 6 Challenger 2s. It's a great tank, but I think it has a rifled bore instead of a smooth bore and it uses that weaker ammo. Something about saftey standards and making the tea taste bad.
The Leopard 2 is said to have better accuracy over the Challenger 2. Though, I mean the Abrams already has a 90% hit rate to hit a moving target while moving... so anything higher is just marginally better.
I also like fast tanks and the Challenger 2 is a little slow due to that amazing armor. Not that I've ever been inside a tank, but I'd want a faster bmt. Gets you to work faster. Abrams has a good compromise for getting to a fight and dealing damage.
Though if a Challenger 2 is going to sit there and camp a spot, it's not like it has to move much. Shooting it doesn't do much, so if you're going to beat it, you gotta make it run out of shells and then hike up the taxes on tea. Game over Challenger 2.
The LeClerc isn't that bad. I think it has 48 shells, which I think is 8 more than the Abrams. More ammo, longer range, little faster... though less armor. It's a tank that has enough rounds so that missing isn't that bad. I think the fire rate was a little higher than the average mbt, but I could be wrong. Can't remember if it used a smaller round, which would explain the larger ammo capacity.
The Leopard 2 just puts round after round into the same hole. You habe to with some of these new armors coming out with the ceramic plates and stuff. Looks awesome while doing it too.