M2 vs A2

Dirtbag_Leader

Dirtbag_Leader

Grand Admiral
Nov 27, 2020
452
1,453
1,300
RSI Handle
Dirtbag_Leader
So I've been building up a Herc chain for quite a while and now that it's close, I'm still undecided on whether I want to go for the M2 or the A2. I do NOT want a C2 due to the lack of the chin turret for a copilot. I've really never been able to fill all the turrets on the A2 and don't use bombs that often, so halving the cargo room seems like a big sacrifice. On the other hand, I have my chain set up so that the A2 is only a $40 premium. Any drunken TEST opinions to share? o7!
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: NomadicHavoc, Ayeteeone, Talonsbane and 1 other person
Bambooza

Bambooza

Space Marshal
Donor
Sep 25, 2017
5,778
18,296
2,875
RSI Handle
MrBambooza
Dirtbag_Leader said:
So I've been building up a Herc chain for quite a while and now that it's close, I'm still undecided on whether I want to go for the M2 or the A2. I do NOT want a C2 due to the lack of the chin turret for a copilot. I've really never been able to fill all the turrets on the A2 and don't use bombs that often, so halving the cargo room seems like a big sacrifice. On the other hand, I have my chain set up so that the A2 is only a $40 premium. Any drunken TEST opinions to share? o7!
Click to expand...
If your not going to use it as a bomber then giving up the cargo space for a unused feature seems like a waste.
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: Shadow Reaper, RoosterRage, NomadicHavoc and 4 others
Ayeteeone

Ayeteeone

Space Marshal
Donor
Oct 22, 2018
674
2,640
2,500
RSI Handle
Ayeteeone
The chin turret is only moderately useful. You need a person in the gunner seat to make it worthwhile, so if you have a friend to fly with regularly then it helps.

The turrets controlled by the co-pilot are also annoying. Last time I used them, had to choose between upper and lower, with the upper having a very limited range of motion. They were ganged together but it was not a happy experience. If you are looking for a bit of forward-firing damage then the lower turret has 360 degree coverage.

A close friend of mine who loves to run cargo absolutely regrets upgrading his C2 to an M2, but can't go back because he'd lose all the discounts applied to that package. If you are not using the bombs, and not planning to move a full Fireteam of TEST dummies, neither of the more expensive ships are likely to improve your game experience.
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: NomadicHavoc, Bambooza, Talonsbane and 1 other person
Talonsbane

Talonsbane

Space Marshal
Donor
Jul 29, 2017
5,883
20,184
3,025
RSI Handle
Talonsbane
My suggestion is simple, if you're sure that you want the M2 for the cargo & whatever else fits hauling it can provide with it's extra chin turret and armor that isn't in the game yet, then go ahead & upgrade to that. IF you're still unsure about the A2, there's no permanent harm in slowly gathering steps to it in case you choose to make that step in the future. Just remember that if you step ahead of where you want the ship to be, the only way back is melting the ship / package that ship is in & starting the CCU dance for it all over again. Worst case scenario, you melt the extra CCUs for store credit later to use on something else.
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: NomadicHavoc, Ayeteeone, Garonman and 1 other person
Bambooza

Bambooza

Space Marshal
Donor
Sep 25, 2017
5,778
18,296
2,875
RSI Handle
MrBambooza
Ayeteeone said:
The chin turret is only moderately useful. You need a person in the gunner seat to make it worthwhile, so if you have a friend to fly with regularly then it helps.

The turrets controlled by the co-pilot are also annoying. Last time I used them, had to choose between upper and lower, with the upper having a very limited range of motion. They were ganged together but it was not a happy experience. If you are looking for a bit of forward-firing damage then the lower turret has 360 degree coverage.

A close friend of mine who loves to run cargo absolutely regrets upgrading his C2 to an M2, but can't go back because he'd lose all the discounts applied to that package. If you are not using the bombs, and not planning to move a full Fireteam of TEST dummies, neither of the more expensive ships are likely to improve your game experience.
Click to expand...
Ya not upgrading my C2. Was never very convinced that the extra armor of the M2 was worth the loss in cargo capacity and now with the Ironclad it makes even less sense. I am sure the M2 will have a purpose just not sure what it is at the moment.
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: NomadicHavoc, Ayeteeone, Garonman and 1 other person
Dirtbag_Leader

Dirtbag_Leader

Grand Admiral
Nov 27, 2020
452
1,453
1,300
RSI Handle
Dirtbag_Leader
See I know that the C2 tends to be the general consensus however I MOSTLY fly ships of this size with a crew of 2-3, and on my aUEC purchased A2 we'd almost always man the chin turret for the additional forward firepower, with the belly turret being for the occasions when we had 3 people. I *think* I care much less about the 150 SCU cargo difference the M2 gives up than the vehicle storage capacity that the A2 gives up, though even in the A2 it's still pretty plentiful. I guess I need to rent a C2 for a while and see how live is with the belly turret rather than the chin turret. . .
And because of the way my CCU chains have shaken out, my only viable paths are -> C2 -> A2 or straight to M2, can't 'stop' at M2 in the middle, oh well!

1716585701538.png

OR
1716585723439.png
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: Shadow Reaper, Ayeteeone, Bambooza and 2 others
wmk

wmk

Space Marshal
Staff member
Officer
Donor
Feb 19, 2018
729
3,495
2,500
RSI Handle
wmk
I love my A2, however I'm not sure if it's worth to upgrade M2 to it.

You lose a rear entry for larger vehicles like Tonks, and small ships like Aurora, Pisces or MPUV. I mean, you can drive Ballista and Spartan over the bomb bay railings, but I'm not sure if it would be possible in the future.

You lose some cargo space, and you get a lot of unwanted attention -- your ship is an infamous jump-town-griefer after all.

That said, there is one aspect of the Starlifter family which is still unknown at this stage: an armor. I can't find the source now, but as far as I remember, C2 supposed to have a light armor, M2 medium and A2 heavy. Erkul says C2 and M2 armor have 1,000 hp, while A2 has... 20,000 hp. I guess M2's number is incorrect; I can imagine both M2 and A2 having the same heavy armor, but we'll see...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

StarCitizen 2024-05-18 00-17-35.png


A2 with Nursa and MPUV in the cargo hold
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: NomadicHavoc, Ayeteeone, Daak Gelrin and 3 others
Sky Captain

Sky Captain

Space Marshal
Donor
Oct 13, 2018
1,837
6,224
2,750
RSI Handle
TheSkyCaptain
I was challenged by the C2/M2/A2 tradeoffs too, until I decided to look past their similarities to see them as very different ships for very different jobs. That led me to pick up the A2 for use as a specialized 'high threat hauler', knowing I have other military haulers to cover other hauling jobs. I also picked up the A2 for its eventual "bombing game'", seeing it as a step up from the Retaliator. Ultimately, the A2 was a decision to buy a very specialized ship for a very specialized job, rather than picking up a more generalized ship that would have replicated roles already covered by my fleet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Glorious
Reactions: Bambooza, Raven_King, Garonman and 3 others
Talonsbane

Talonsbane

Space Marshal
Donor
Jul 29, 2017
5,883
20,184
3,025
RSI Handle
Talonsbane
Sky Captain said:
I was challenged by the Hercules C2/M2/A2 tradeoffs too, until I decided to look past their similarities to see them as different ships for different jobs. In the end I picked up the A2 for use as a specialized 'high threat hauler', knowing I have other military haulers to cover other hauling jobs. I also picked up the A2 for its eventual "bombing game'", seeing it as a step up from the Retaliator.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't the Polaris be the step up from the Retaliator, 6x S9 torps to 24x S10 torps?
 
  • Like
  • o7
Reactions: Bambooza, Garonman and Ayeteeone
Talonsbane

Talonsbane

Space Marshal
Donor
Jul 29, 2017
5,883
20,184
3,025
RSI Handle
Talonsbane
Sky Captain said:
Agreed ... for the torpedo version of bombing.
Click to expand...
Personally, the #1 reason I'd have to upgrade to an A2 would be IF I'd be able to substitute the S10 bombs with alcohol kegs with parachutes, so that I could ensure that every TESTie gets thoroughly "bombed" in the most TESTified ways possible during our gatherings. Until then, my C2 will have to suffice in non-hostile zones with my M2 covering the hostile areas. Cheers!
 
  • Like
  • Glorious
  • Drunk
Reactions: Bambooza, Dirtbag_Leader, Garonman and 3 others
Ayeteeone

Ayeteeone

Space Marshal
Donor
Oct 22, 2018
674
2,640
2,500
RSI Handle
Ayeteeone
Bambooza said:
Ya not upgrading my C2. Was never very convinced that the extra armor of the M2 was worth the loss in cargo capacity and now with the Ironclad it makes even less sense. I am sure the M2 will have a purpose just not sure what it is at the moment.
Click to expand...
Breaking News! (and a good laugh!) The friend of mine mentioned in that post took about 30 seconds to upgrade his M2 to an Ironclad Assault for the Princely Sum of $5.

I like the M2 for it's purpose but in his case the upgrade was a genuine steal.
 
  • Like
  • Glorious
Reactions: Bambooza, Raven_King, Talonsbane and 3 others
Dirtbag_Leader

Dirtbag_Leader

Grand Admiral
Nov 27, 2020
452
1,453
1,300
RSI Handle
Dirtbag_Leader
Ayeteeone said:
Breaking News! (and a good laugh!) The friend of mine mentioned in that post took about 30 seconds to upgrade his M2 to an Ironclad Assault for the Princely Sum of $5.
Click to expand...
And in more breaking news, I also grabbed that $5 CCU, but seems that the Assault has ALREADY increased in price $10, making our $5 worth $15!
 
  • Like
  • Glorious
Reactions: Shadow Reaper, Bambooza, NaffNaffBobFace and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Forgot your password?