TL;DR - Watch more illegal porn.
I love how if someone has a valid concern it is the norm now for it to be a tin foil hat theory. If you have a counterpoint I would rather hear than.
The fact that large companies like Microsoft caters to "what we want" as consumers is undeniable but there are many ways Microsoft could have implemented and catered to that demand. I don't have a problem with Google or Facebook collecting that information because it is an on-demand service and what they collect is somewhat limited. I can turn off a webservice. If I don't want to share something I don't. Personally, I don't use Facebook not for any particular tin-foily reason other than it doesn't add anything substancial to my life. If I want to contact my friends, I do use other means. Don't get me wrong though, I've used it, it was a fad and I'm over it.
The issue with Windows 10 is that it doesn't turn off its "helping" you. Moreover, if I want to use mordern programs like Creative Suite, Quickbooks, AutoCAD, ArcGIS, or most modern games, I have to subject myself to what essentially amounts to forced "search and seizure". I hate to break out big words like the US Government especially in a tin-foil conversation but Government contracts are a huge payday for Microsoft and other large companies and if that government feels it should have backdoors and ways to collect information from every user, hypothetically, Microsoft will ablige. This has little to do with legalities or ethics or unconstitutionality. Technologically, the information can be collected and used and it is. It just isn't admissible in court, or if it is, you can't see it in open court for "national security" reasons.
This happened with ATT. They couldn't do it fast enough.
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/know-nsa-atts-spying-pact/
My biggest concern with this whole thing is that somehow we should expect and be grateful to have someone like Microsoft or anyone that buys the information they collect looking over our shoulder. I don't care for it. This does not automatically make me a criminal just because I like my privacy.
Just being pragmatic, this sort of blanket surveillance policy has never ever ever ever been a benefit to the population subjected to it. Most often than not, this sort policy du jour has been dubbed highly unethical because it allows for specific people and populations to be harrassed and adversly affected and these policies have subsequently been made illegal with huge backlash. If you want any examples of this, I'd like to throw out a few big word examples like Cointelpro, Soviet Union, McCarthyism, East Germany, Morocco in the 50s. This type of policy is certainly not new even if the technology is. This has been governments biggest wet dream forever. This will not save your life like on TV. Jack Bauer isn't a real person. Blanket surveillance policy have always been used to harass and control a population considered "unruly" by its current power structure.
Maybe you don't care though and it doesn't affect you or your amazon purchases or you're choice of porn (BTW streaming porn is most entirely illegal, so yeah I's a criminal) but man, perspective, there are other people it does affect.
Anyways, back to porn...