With the into of the Prowler, we now find ourselves in the same seat that many fighter pilots were sitting in a year ago when they showed off the Sabre. what is better stealth and speed or overwhelming firepower? I am going to try to give you some answers, however I do not believe one is better then the other, maybe for your uses you will find it otherwise. But objectively these two ships both have pros and cons. As I will talk more in detail later I think we are suffering from old stats on the Redeemer.
I think some of the oddest stats come in the because of the redeemer is on the old outdated stat system. like, the Prowler has a listed size 3 shield and a side 2 power plant. where the Redeemer crushes it with a size 6 shield and size 6 power plant, and at the same time having a smaller cross section and lighter then the Prowler. I would not take these states to heart as I believe this is manly because of the old data on the Redeemer, but I do believe we will see more power and shields on the redeemer when all is said and done.
When we talk about firepower the redeemer is the clear winner, no questions asked. Although the Prowler boosts bigger guns (x3 s5) the Redeemers firepower is a godly 20 S2 missiles, x6 s3 guns, and (if I am reading the spec page right, X2 S4 - X4 FL33) X8 S4 guns!!! so if you are looking to turn your enemies into a pile of dirt read no more, your winner is the Redeemer... but if you are not looking for the most guns keep reading.
We know the Prowler is a stealth ship, where the redeemer is a gun ship. So what is better? well I would say it depends on your mission, if you want to land troops, take off and blast any one that sticks their head out. Redeemer. If you want to sneak in, drop your troops off and let them handle the rest, Prowler all the way.
The way I am looking at the two is the Redeemer will be more versatile, and be better suited to getting troops out in open combat and providing extra support until the job is done. Where I can see the Prowler being a "Black-Ops" ship, if you need to get SF in, and then deny them ever being there, Prowler baby.
So what ship is best for you? For me, I am going to stick to the Redeemer for now, but the Prowler is one good looking ship.... as much as it brakes my heart to say so being an Aegis man.
I think some of the oddest stats come in the because of the redeemer is on the old outdated stat system. like, the Prowler has a listed size 3 shield and a side 2 power plant. where the Redeemer crushes it with a size 6 shield and size 6 power plant, and at the same time having a smaller cross section and lighter then the Prowler. I would not take these states to heart as I believe this is manly because of the old data on the Redeemer, but I do believe we will see more power and shields on the redeemer when all is said and done.
When we talk about firepower the redeemer is the clear winner, no questions asked. Although the Prowler boosts bigger guns (x3 s5) the Redeemers firepower is a godly 20 S2 missiles, x6 s3 guns, and (if I am reading the spec page right, X2 S4 - X4 FL33) X8 S4 guns!!! so if you are looking to turn your enemies into a pile of dirt read no more, your winner is the Redeemer... but if you are not looking for the most guns keep reading.
We know the Prowler is a stealth ship, where the redeemer is a gun ship. So what is better? well I would say it depends on your mission, if you want to land troops, take off and blast any one that sticks their head out. Redeemer. If you want to sneak in, drop your troops off and let them handle the rest, Prowler all the way.
The way I am looking at the two is the Redeemer will be more versatile, and be better suited to getting troops out in open combat and providing extra support until the job is done. Where I can see the Prowler being a "Black-Ops" ship, if you need to get SF in, and then deny them ever being there, Prowler baby.
So what ship is best for you? For me, I am going to stick to the Redeemer for now, but the Prowler is one good looking ship.... as much as it brakes my heart to say so being an Aegis man.