Honestly trying not to call anyone in particular out, but there are some people with obnoxiously large images in their signatures. Any chance we could tone the size limit down to a respectable limit?
To my mind, that's huge. The vertical dimension is the killer here - the farther I have to scroll to get to the next bit of interesting content, the worse. most folks are going to be browsing the forums on 1080p-class screens, so after you take into account menu bars and the like, 400px vertical is easily 1/2 to 1/3 of the entire vertical screen area. That sig is interesting maybe once per thread, max, but it appears every time that person posts, taking up half the screen, Every. Single. Time.Most forums I visit have the sig size limit set at 400x400. Not very big, but that's the point.
I honestly forget if I have a signature here at the moment, but normally I don't use signatures at all. They're silly, frivolous, and... and... a forum signature killed my father. There, it's out. Hate me if you want, but I'm not changing my opinion.
*EDIT* I totes don't, so I didn't even erode my integrity upon revealing my secret hate of forum signatures.
Done and Done.
Us poor 1080p plebs cannot handle the 1200 x 800 pics some people have.No clue how massive mine is. Will have to check. 4k FTW
960*143.No clue how massive mine is. Will have to check. 4k FTW
Norton II, Emperor of the Internets and Lord Protector of the Lesser Tubes, thanks you for your well wishes.Neat. As an aside that's related to fourm layout stuff, classy choice with emporer Norton (may his reign last a thousand years).