Hull C gone from roadmap

Thalstan

Thalstan

Space Marshal
Jun 5, 2016
2,088
7,428
2,850
RSI Handle
Thalstan
new roadmap is up...The Hull C is gone. Looks like the orbital warehouses are gone too and ship to station docking is in 4.0.

I had a bad feeling when Lando mentioned the Hull C and it "needing a lot of things" when they did the SCL today...

From the Roundup
Hull-C
Work on this ship continues, but its release is currently blocked by a few tech pre-requisites including a physics refactor that needs to be submitted to our game-dev stream, as well as additional work from the engine team that will create scaleable & multiple physics grids. We are continuing to work on the Hull-C, but are prioritizing its needs for Squadron 42 – the work we plan to finalize in Q4 is not quite enough for a PU release.

If you were curious about the Cutlass Blue being moved back.
Cutlass Blue
The Cutlass Blue has moved from 3.8 to 3.9 for a couple of reasons, but they boil down to the Banu Defender taking longer than initially planned. With work on the Defender being wrapped up for 3.7, either the Cutlass Red or Blue needed to move back one quarter. After evaluation, the decision was made to focus on the Cutlass Red, resulting in the Cutlass Blue moving back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael, Bambooza and Sayora
Sayora

Sayora

Grand Admiral
Donor
Oct 23, 2018
656
3,270
1,000
RSI Handle
Sayora
Hull-C
Work on this ship continues, but its release is currently blocked by a few tech pre-requisites including a physics refactor that needs to be submitted to our game-dev stream, as well as additional work from the engine team that will create scaleable & multiple physics grids. We are continuing to work on the Hull-C, but are prioritizing its needs for Squadron 42 – the work we plan to finalize in Q4 is not quite enough for a PU release.
Click to expand...
I saw this coming when they moved back ship to station docking, really sucks I have a Hull-C CCU and was getting excited to use it. Should have known better
 
  • Like
Reactions: NaffNaffBobFace and Bambooza
NaffNaffBobFace

NaffNaffBobFace

Space Marshal
Donor
Jan 5, 2016
12,237
44,990
3,150
RSI Handle
NaffNaffBobFace
Bambooza said:
It indeed sucks it seems SQ42 is cannibalizing all the development resources and the PU will really not see any major updates until after SQ42 beta.
Click to expand...
I was expecting this to be the case and anything that's improved for S42 would be what arrives in the PU patches until the single player game is done. Just stands to reason.

On the plus side, however we are getting close to getting one of the parts of the game!!!1

I will have to see how much it retails for, however although I already own a copy of S42 with my original pledge, I really want to buy an off-the-shelf copy too :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sayora and Bambooza
Thugari

Thugari

Space Marshal
Mar 11, 2016
1,325
4,571
2,600
RSI Handle
Thugari
Let them work squadron 42, its single player, same engine, same tech. this will end up win/win. all the assets being worked out in sq42 is easily transferable to star citizen. i feel that overall once sq42 hits alpha, star citizen is going to come along fast.
 
  • o7
  • Like
Reactions: Sayora and maynard
Tealwraith

Tealwraith

Heresy detector
Donor
May 31, 2017
1,056
4,822
2,650
RSI Handle
Tealwraith
My guess is that they are still having issues with the physics grids for the Connie/Merlin, Caterpillar/Command module, etc., and this is delaying every ship with a weird ship-to-ship connection. Hope they get it ironed out soonest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bambooza and Sayora
Radegast74

Radegast74

Space Marshal
Oct 8, 2016
3,010
10,706
2,900
RSI Handle
Radegast74
Bambooza said:
It indeed sucks it seems SQ42 is cannibalizing all the development resources and the PU will really not see any major updates until after SQ42 beta.
Click to expand...
This is what I've been expecting. Honestly, it is probably in everybody's best interests if they just focus on getting SQ42 out the door in the best shape possible...then they can pivot and focus *all* available resources on SC.

Half-measures on everything usually only ensures everything is half-baked.
 
  • o7
  • Like
Reactions: Sayora and maynard
Printimus

Printimus

Space Marshal
Officer
Donor
Dec 22, 2015
10,674
39,041
3,160
RSI Handle
Printimus
Sad to see the cargo ship moved, but extremely happy to see some logical explanations in regards to why they are adjusting/moving things around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sayora
Bambooza

Bambooza

Space Marshal
Donor
Sep 25, 2017
5,778
18,296
2,875
RSI Handle
MrBambooza
Radegast74 said:
This is what I've been expecting. Honestly, it is probably in everybody's best interests if they just focus on getting SQ42 out the door in the best shape possible...then they can pivot and focus *all* available resources on SC.

Half-measures on everything usually only ensures everything is half-baked.
Click to expand...

That's the issue they already said they are not going to pivot the development staff working on SQ42 to the PU as they will start working on Ep2. I just hope that the cannibalized resources will return to the PU and not remain working on SQ42 until it dries up.
 
Tealwraith

Tealwraith

Heresy detector
Donor
May 31, 2017
1,056
4,822
2,650
RSI Handle
Tealwraith
What I want to know is, why did they drop the Taurus off the roadmap? Is it so different from the Andromeda, Aquila, Phoenix and Emerald Phoenix that they can't make it flight ready? Is CI having so many problems with the physics grids that they need to get the cargo lift working without stuff falling through the floor before they finish the Taurus? Can CI not deliver on the shielded cargo bay so they stopped production? Did CR say that the Cutlass is good enough for now, so develop other ships and they'll get a new cargo ship out when time permits? I can't understand not finishing the Constellation line, especially when the Taurus should be the easiest of the line to finish. GRRRRRRRRRR!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bambooza
Michael

Michael

Space Marshal
Sep 27, 2016
1,246
4,513
2,650
RSI Handle
Pewbaca
Tealwraith said:
What I want to know is, why did they drop the Taurus off the roadmap? Is it so different from the Andromeda, Aquila, Phoenix and Emerald Phoenix that they can't make it flight ready? Is CI having so many problems with the physics grids that they need to get the cargo lift working without stuff falling through the floor before they finish the Taurus? Can CI not deliver on the shielded cargo bay so they stopped production? Did CR say that the Cutlass is good enough for now, so develop other ships and they'll get a new cargo ship out when time permits? I can't understand not finishing the Constellation line, especially when the Taurus should be the easiest of the line to finish. GRRRRRRRRRR!
Click to expand...
I'm just guessing:
- maybe they decided to update the constellation series (with or after ship to ship docking?) with the phoenix?
- Most likely also more ressources will be shifted towards SQ42 and moved away from the PU
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bambooza
Thalstan

Thalstan

Space Marshal
Jun 5, 2016
2,088
7,428
2,850
RSI Handle
Thalstan
I suspect the Taurus will benefit from the physics refactoring that they need for the Hull C. Once they have that physics refactor, expect elevators and movable cargo decks to be better than they are currently.

This will also benefit ships like the 600i, 890J, the Retaliator (internal modules can then be added), and the Reclaimer
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bambooza
Thalstan

Thalstan

Space Marshal
Jun 5, 2016
2,088
7,428
2,850
RSI Handle
Thalstan
it's only going to be as good as they need it for SQ42, but it won't cut it for the PU
 
BUTUZ

BUTUZ

Space Marshal
Donor
Apr 8, 2016
3,604
12,199
2,850
RSI Handle
BUTUZ
It's sure gone from my hangar!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Forgot your password?