Mechanic ‘Accidentally’ Fires Vulcan Cannon & Obliterates F-16 Sitting on the Runway
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/news/f-16.html
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/news/f-16.html
Hella loud. I'm sure some poop came out too.Can you imagine how loud that must have been for the techs standing around and not prepared?
Mechanic ‘Accidentally’ Fires Vulcan Cannon & Obliterates F-16 Sitting on the Runway
View attachment 15226
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/news/f-16.html
or was that Tuesday night?Looks like another Thursday night to me. What's the problem?
No, it wasn't just Tuesday night... It was Tuesday night and Thursday night!or was that Tuesday night?
I think this also produce a nice and loud amount of colorful course by many people, especially the base chief...Can you imagine how loud that must have been for the techs standing around and not prepared?
Well you don't see the wall behind it...Meanwhile the tarmac, grass, hedge rows etc all survived the Vulcan spurt??? :o
IIRC, there is also a weight on wheels sensor that is supposed to prevent this type of thing from happening.Belgian F-16 from last year... lol. Oops.
There's a holdback tool installed to safe an M-61A1 because it's electrically primed, so the tool keeps the rounds from being chambered when the gun rotates. Seems they did a hydraulic spin check of the system, without the tool installed. Which includes squeezing the trigger to test the rotation of the system, with electrical power on of course. Why they would do this with a loaded system and not ensure the holdback tool was installed is beyond me... plus not ensuring there is anything in front of the cannon as it rotated.
It's science, and engineering.
My head hurts now, as I sobered up slightly. Going to down a few beers to help.
So true man...and the worst thing is that is not only in these particular cases, but in most of the industry and working place: superficiality and poor understanding of procedure are a day to day standard nowaday....IIRC, there is also a weight on wheels sensor that is supposed to prevent this type of thing from happening.
Question, how many other times have safety systems been defeated so that mechanics can take short cuts? How often has management looked the other way because it gets things done faster? How many people have been given on the job training by senior mechanics that “this is how we do things here”....
these things rarely happen because of a one off mistake. These things happen because safety systems are bypassed on a regular basis, and management either ignores these issues, is ignorant of the issues because they don’t have good supervision in place, or encourages it because they like the (normal) results?
when you investigate things like this, it’s important that you don’t stop at the individual, but look beyond to find the root cause. Otherwise, this will just end up happening again.
Lot's of shortcuts abound, that's for sure. Some of the safety items require bypassing, per the tech data, in order to perform certain tests. But that's why there are multiple safes. Like you said, the weight on wheels function needs to be bypassed by using the armament ground override switch, in order to test the functionality of the weapons systems on the ground. But knowing that, you have to ensure you're following all the other safety precautions. Production rates skyrocket while manning drops, and suddenly you find yourself with 18 or more hours of work to compress into a 12hr shift. People rush, shortcuts are taken, and stories like this happen.IIRC, there is also a weight on wheels sensor that is supposed to prevent this type of thing from happening.
Question, how many other times have safety systems been defeated so that mechanics can take short cuts? How often has management looked the other way because it gets things done faster? How many people have been given on the job training by senior mechanics that “this is how we do things here”....
these things rarely happen because of a one off mistake. These things happen because safety systems are bypassed on a regular basis, and management either ignores these issues, is ignorant of the issues because they don’t have good supervision in place, or encourages it because they like the (normal) results?
when you investigate things like this, it’s important that you don’t stop at the individual, but look beyond to find the root cause. Otherwise, this will just end up happening again.