Search results

View: https://youtu.be/zQVmhAgh41E?t=28

This will be Druidia after Test has been there for a week.

I was going to say they are a little tight but I've loaded rail cars with armored vehicles when I was with the Big Red One. Here is part of a brigade loaded up on a RO-RO ship heading back stateside from Germany. Your images have them a little tight, but not alot tight. .

To serve 15000+ drunks?

I don't see Test building a bar, well more than a board and a couple of empty kegs. I certainly don't us see supplying it. The supplies are likely to disappear enroute.

They still aren't finished with Stanton. Server performance has nothing to do with system building, just adding the systems to what we currently have. 100 systems at launch was the stretch goal.

I didn't see much of a bar.

Even at 10 systems per year it is still 10 more years.

Origin already has a ship with the capacity of the Liberator. The 890J.

That is the primary reason I have an MSR. :)

Refueling, from the Liberator tanks should be a given but the least needed of the three R's. These ships can traverse a star system. Deploy them from empty space a few million km from their target area. Repair and rearm are the more important capabilities.

With this 3.15 PTU patch they added local inventory. The ships are at your home port. The gear I want for my ships is scattered all over the place. The gear can not be moved to your ship storage. To install ship components and weapons you have to fly to where you can purchase the component...

AFAIK, the only ship that carries subcraft, where CIG hasn't said yes, it can repair, rearm and refuel the subcraft is the Connie, which doesn't have a Q&A and they haven't said either way. I expect the Liberator to be able to.

The Terrapin, and the 315P for that matter, is a carrier craft. Its quantum tank is way to small for anything other than in system transit. The same is true of the Herald.

I would say no more than 5, since the sales page says 5 "landing pads." Will it actually be able to handle 5? Maybe, based on the following:. The animation of the rear ramp has two modes, one is clearly for loading ground vehicles, the other looks like it is designed to recover spaceships...

This ship is specifically advertised as launching carried fighters for defense. Unlike the Carrack, the Caterpillar the 890J, or the Hercules, this ship is specifically listed as a "light carrier."

Thanks

Thanks.

That is me. :) Thanks.

That is a Tonk a Ballista and an MPUV on the lower deck in the second image on the sales page.