Search results

I ccu'd two of my three remaining Nox's. One to an Ursa Rover and the other to a base cyclone. Apart from Tali modules, which, once again, are not on sale, and some stalker cells for my Titan I am done. Avenger Titan Vanguard Sentinel (+ Warden BUK) Retaliator Dragonfly Nox Cyclone Ursa

The Drake aesthetic just doesn't cut it for me. The interiors of World War 2 bombers looks more advanced. In second place, for me, is Robert's Strut Industries.

With the Avenger carrying two size 3 and a Size 4 weapon mounts, without a major rework the only thing the reliant has going for it is two seats.

No idea if it is any different than the last time I played, which has been a while. The Transit times from Port Oli to Hurston is insane though.

Both Front and Rear Cargo Modules have, according to the module page, lifts. No idea what they will look like after the rework. Edited to add. One point, any vehicles would have to load from the front of the rear compartment or the rear of the front compartment meaning unloading both at the...

Holy Crap. My Tali and my Vanguard are fast. :)

One other that wasn't mentioned, but that is probably due to it feeling like abandonware from CIG. The Retaliator, with its choice in modules. Granted it isn't really a solo ship, but then again neither are most of the ships on this list.

I am not a spy, though I used to be in HUMINT and some would say that counts.

A World War II PT boat got it on with a F-117 and the Retaliator is what was born. :)

I don't have the double width hangar, must be because of a size 5 ship, or bigger, in your inventory. My ships are still on fire in the hangar and there is still no hangar persistence. You would think they could, at least, fix that.

Jump in my Vanguard, since my Avenger is on cool down. Grab a delivery mission. Run to the wreck location, man the Vanguard sounds like it has plenty of power. Exit ship and it throws me through the roof of the exit. EVA to the cargo, pick up the cargo, go back to ship, takes 6 tries to get...

Not overly impressed. Slight improvements, for example I can now go out 3 out of 4 doors on Ollisar instead of only 1 in 4. Frame rate, usually slightly better. Land on Daymar, try to get out, CTD. Second run, land on Daymar, pick up crime stat for getting too close to another ship on landing...

They are lying about a few things. Either that or the entire team is grossly incompetent.

I am not looking for anything. I am just venting.

The frustration I am feeling is not game development but being talked down to while they pretend to be developing a game.

I am not treating it as a final game, by any stretch of the imagination. I am tired of being lied to and their technobabble which they use to make themselves sound important while they ignore all good practices for software development.

It has been a year and a half since using it and 8 years since reading the manual on it that we were using. We didn't use an overall term for it and I don't' remember the name of the manual. The real difference between the methods, from what I understand, is who gets the royalties or the...

No because testing is the same especially if you are using Agile.

I not only know what Alpha is, I know what Alpha is supposed to be and what testing should be going on if you ever want to progress out of alpha.

Probably, but it is an opinion based on years of experience of what Agile actually is and what it is supposed to be. And Unlike CIG I have actually run QA that has published software. :)