Search results

Unfortunately I have to agree that it's 99% going to be related to the Pioneer land claims. Guess the other ship teased in the Hammerhead Galactic Tours is a play on people's expectations....

The only Connies in 3.0 are the Andro and Aquila, both can carry the rover. And yes the rover fits into the Starfarer. You can technically squeeze 2 or 3 in it.

That's 197km from Dunlow and 241km from ArcCorp. You probably want to look for ground with these features, you should be able to find it if you are in the general area. Some other points from OM if you are having a hard time zeroing in: OM1: 472 OM2: 242 OM3: 606 OM4: 652 OM5: 768 OM6: 531...

Here's the location via star map and two marked locations, Dunlow Ridge and ArcCorp 141. Hope this helps you guys! It's within these 3 distinctive land marks on the mobiglass. The locations in green are from the ship cockpit and should be used for distance reference only. The 2 locations in blue...

Eh, I think the ship is on the left blur, not the right blur... Looks like a flying dildo though...

That's something new, thanks!

I totally forgot to put that! Thanks!

It is possible to modify your hammerhead according to the fluff. I shall weld Auroras in place of all my turrets. All shall fear the might of the mighty Aurora Hammer!

So what do you think it is? Since it's coming out so soon after the Pioneer, so it should be something interesting. Based off the Galactic Tours vid teaser we got in the Hammerhead edition, I think it has something to do with boarding tubes. Or drop pods. Our Testies shall rain from the skies!

Must. Resist. Urge... At least, until the final new ship is revealed on Tue the 28th. Then at least I can make an informed choice of which ship I want to get. Suspecting it's a boarding ship. Or boarding tube with rockets. Or both.

Yeah the keybinding layout ingame hasn't been updated yet, which was why I chosed to type out the ones that don't match, I should have mentioned that sorry :sweat: I'll add a note to the first post. What kind of Testie would we be if we didn't have SD buttons to press on demand, or when we feel...

Hey guys, trying to start a list of the updated key bindings for sharing since they might not be obvious, and some of them have changed from 2.6.3 Self-destruct / Suicide (very important for Testies) = LEFT Alt + Backspace Leave seat / cockpit = LEFT Alt + F, Press and HOLD Ship Lights = LEFT...

Help. I've Sat Down. And I Can't Get Up!

Actually the first thing I thought was 'It's a Helicarrier' rather than a hammerhead. Just with all the protruding bits replaced with turrets. Also, I think it may have 6 turrets, as there should be one more in the belly if we are talking about 360 anti-ship coverage. Pretty sure it's going...

Indeed haha. Smaller than the engine nacelles of a Star Destroyer, but still large enough to fly through. Going to do more exploration as soon as I can log back in. Darn that 15006 error.

Ah, but 6 sec after that screenshot the game crashed on me, so Test SOP has been followed :sweat_smile:

Managed to do that scene where the Millennium Falcon flies through the Star Destroyer Derelict, using the Javelin Derelict on Daymar :v::beer::beers: Only through the engine though :yum:

That's the thing, in the latest Jump Point, af few of the alpha designs actually show that the arm was used to allow the hull to be extended along it, giving it a larger interior construction space for the modules. At the moment though, it just looks like a rather dingy :thumbsup:

That might be true, though the current size of the pad certainly won't fit a constellation, let alone a Starfarer. I do think your idea that the arm should be able to receive materials from nearby has merit though, since that can easily be solved by using drones, or just use a interface type pad...

That technically makes the landing pad redundant, doesn't it? It becomes a glorified basketball court if everyone lands next to the arm instead.