3.2 evocati?

[FeaturedSpace]

Of course, I'm not talking about the people that pay close attention to the roadmap, as most of those people are very invested time and moneywise into SC and they don't care as much when things come out, as long as they do eventually..

I do agree with you though. I am just also vocalizing the small section of SC's fanbase that's fed up with delays. Even though we are SO clearly making large amounts of progress, it's unbelievable...

 

[NaffNaffBobFace]

Of course, I'm not talking about the people that pay close attention to the roadmap, as most of those people are very invested time and moneywise into SC and they don't care as much when things come out, as long as they do eventually..

I do agree with you though. I am just also vocalizing the small section of SC's fanbase that's fed up with delays. Even though we are SO clearly making large amounts of progress, it's unbelievable...

I know what you mean, and the progress is fantastic.

I don't deny any detractor their frustrations, mostly as I am a detractor of some parts of the game like my beloved 350R and how it has been nothing but nerfed since its inception. I am no saint, I have complained probably as much as the Cutlass crew before the rework.

I would ask detractors, however, that once one of their concerns has been addressed they accept the answer and stop the [CONCERN]... So many times I've seen CIG address detractors concerns only for them to ignore the response and then raise it again the next time a similar thing happens, over and over and over.

"They've changed the funding model so LTI is only on new money, it must mean they are broke!"
"This is what people have been asking us for since 2014 - The original backers are disappointed that LTI continued after the original kickstarter, this is a compromise to help make them happy."
"CIG IS BROKE!!!!1"

"They've created a $27,000 package, they must be broke!"
"We've had multiple requests to update the completionist package, this is the new almost-all-ships package. It costs a lot as there are a lot more ships in it."
"CIG IS BROKE!!!!1!!!!"

I accept and understand they are concerned, really it is to their credit that they want to see the project succeed just as I do, but once they've got their answers i'd really rather they accept them - or what they are pushing for is not an answer to their concern, it is simply pushing for what they want to hear and if they do not hear exactly that they then act like they have been in some way disrespected, whereas their ignoring a perfectly valid answer is, IMHO, disrespectful... But thats just me.

*Disclaimer* This opinion is in no way endorsed by TEST. I don't speak for TEST, I speak for me :slight_smile:

 

[FeaturedSpace]

I know what you mean, and the progress is fantastic.

I don't deny any detractor their frustrations, mostly as I am a detractor of some parts of the game like my beloved 350R and how it has been nothing but nerfed since its inception. I am no saint, I have complained probably as much as the Cutlass crew before the rework.

I would ask detractors, however, that once one of their concerns has been addressed they accept the answer and stop the [CONCERN]... So many times I've seen CIG address detractors concerns only for them to ignore the response and then raise it again the next time a similar thing happens, over and over and over.

"They've changed the funding model so LTI is only on new money, it must mean they are broke!"
"This is what people have been asking us for since 2014 - The original backers are disappointed that LTI continued after the original kickstarter, this is a compromise to help make them happy."
"CIG IS BROKE!!!!1"

"They've created a $27,000 package, they must be broke!"
"We've had multiple requests to update the completionist package, this is the new almost-all-ships package. It costs a lot as there are a lot more ships in it."
"CIG IS BROKE!!!!1!!!!"

I accept and understand they are concerned, really it is to their credit that they want to see the project succeed, but once they've got their answers i'd really rather they accept them - or what they are pushing for is not an answer to their concern, it is simply pushing for what they want to hear and if they do not hear exactly that they the act like they have been in some way disrespected, whereas their ignoring a perfectly valid answer is, IMHO, disrespectful... But thats just me.

*Disclaimer* This opinion is in no way endorsed by TEST. I don't speak for TEST, I speak for me :slight_smile:

VERY WELL SPOKEN. HEAR HEAR! :laughing: :beers:

 

[Bambooza]

What in the world has CIG been doing "stabilizing 3.1"? There's got to be more of a balance between devs working on the current patch and ones working on the future... The ships thing does make sense though, seeing as CIG only employees about 15, maybe 20 people to make ships..

I am sure most are working on their features with a small team working on stabilization that is then ported to the current working branch.

 

[FeaturedSpace]

I don't know it seems like they haven't begun working on some of the things until just now, especially with their statement that they've just now "moved over devs to begin more work on 3.2 features". Sorry if I'm missing something here, guys!

 

[Stoutman]

3.2 is NOT in Evocati yet.

Remember, you can please most of the people most of the time if you try.

But it is impossible to please all of the people all of the time.

 

[FeaturedSpace]

Plus, I'd hate to be in the Evocati honestly :laughing: too much work!

 

[CrudeSasquatch]

7 winks. Looks like your gonna spend the night alone after all!!!

No change there

 

[CrudeSasquatch]

Plus, I'd hate to be in the Evocati honestly :laughing: too much work!

Damn right! Gimme a GAME that's DONE. All you nutters that can afford to play it before it's done... koodoos!

 

[Sraika]

3.2 is actually in evocati now, btw.
According to the roadmap, at least.

 

[BUTUZ]

3.2 is actually in evocati now, btw.
According to the roadmap, at least.

Yes which means I was right! Coz you know there's an even more secret version of the evocati that tests it before the evocati officially gets their hands on it? :o

 

[Carlos Spicyweiner]

Yes which means I was right! Coz you know there's an even more secret version of the evocati that tests it before the evocati officially gets their hands on it? :open_mouth:

Yep, they're called the game devocati, and they actually get PAID to play SC!

 

[NaffNaffBobFace]

Yep, they're called the game devocati, and they actually get PAID to play SC!

I heared the Devocati have an arcane secret language that they never speak, only write, and from that language the mightiest of battleships down to the smallest of Benny's cartons come into being... The Devocati are powerful beings indeed...

 

[Bambooza]

So cannot wait to get behind the helm of this ship in a little over a month.

 

[CrudeSasquatch]

So cannot wait to get behind the helm of this ship in a little over a month.

View attachment 9877

I can't wait to get into the Jacuzzi

 

[Sraika]

So cannot wait to get behind the helm of this ship in a little over a month.

View attachment 9877

Wait, you're actually going to fly it? I thought the point was to have other people fly you around in it :wink:

 

[CrudeSasquatch]

Well

Wait, you're actually going to fly it? I thought the point was to have other people fly you around in it :wink:

When you own a Lamborghini sports car you don't let the help drive it. .

 

[Bambooza]

Well

When you own a Lamborghini sports car you don't let the help drive it. .

Indeed. Now if it was a 890j i'd say letting the help fly it would be spot on as you'd be to busy in the Jacuzzi with the A list hotties.

 

[Blind Owl]

to busy in the Jacuzzi with the A list hotties

You called?