HeadClot
Grand Admiral
Yes?so, I'm going to get billed extra to download all these fucking snowflakes now?
Yes?so, I'm going to get billed extra to download all these fucking snowflakes now?
Literally unplayable and Unreadable. I demand a refund!No snowflakes via reading on my phn
You will have even slower snowflakes unless montoya pays your ISPso, I'm going to get billed extra to download all these fucking snowflakes now?
$.99 for snowso, I'm going to get billed extra to download all these fucking snowflakes now?
But these are not snowflakes they are dandruffYou will have even slower snowflakes unless montoya pays your ISP
brilliant$.99 for snow
$2.00 for faster snow
$200.00 to opt out of the snow as its a breach of the contract you signed when you joined TEST
There is no charge for @Montoya dandruffBut these are not snowflakes they are dandruff
I almost forgot your account will also be charged $10.00 for contacting customer support.brilliant
Yeah Congress can still fix this. People need to call their repsI believe we still have congress and if a new president comes into office in 2020 that is in favor of Net Neutrality this can all be reversed, all they would have to do is sign their name on a paper and show their work to the camera like a preschooler..
Currently California,Delaware,Hawaii,Illinois,Iowa,Kentucky,Maine,Maryland,Massachusetts,Mississippi,New York,North Carolina,Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia and Washington are suing the current administration and looking to set up their own Net Neutrality laws on the state level like they did with the Paris climate stuff. I mean when you get Mississippi and California to agree on something you know you might of fucked up...
Anonymous has been strangely silent about all of this. My guess is that they may be ready for something, and they have better cards up their sleeve than "lead poisoning".I have a feeling that some crazyperson is going to attempt to give Mr. Pai a bit of lead poisoning very soon...
They have been vocal about this. I have learned from a fairly early age. Do not trust the guy beating his chest. Trust the guy who is silent and planning. The Silent and Planning people are anonymous. The person who was beating his chest today was Pai.Anonymous has been strangely silent about all of this. My guess is that they may be ready for something, and they have better cards up their sleeve than "lead poisoning".
The problem isn't really that Google would get throttled, it's that other webpages would not compete on the same level.Let me get the world's tiniest violin tuned up for Google having to spend some of its bean bag chair budget on the bandwidth they are using. That's not extortion and that's not double paid. If content services needed people to stick up for them, maybe they could try providing better services and content instead of steadily providing worse.
I'm okay with being wrong on this if I am. In 2 weeks, I can go back reading books as a pass time if I have to.
Same reason those opposed to it are trying so hard. Call me cynic, but when the scaremongering starts, the only thing that's sure is someone's trying to drum up support on some emotional level. I just don't believe that either side of this is on the side of giving their customers better service for lower price. Safer to assume everyone has some bias they are keeping to themselves, and I definitely would not rule out the ulterior motives of those claiming net neutrality is the thing keeping this house of cards standing.why would they push so hard for it?
Really? I missed that. Have a link or something?They have been vocal about this.
I'm just worried that Sweden, in it's decades long effort to become the US, would do something like this and cause me to have to pay for individual websites/services. I don't pay differently for what I do with my water or electricity, I just pay for the amount I use. The way I see it, these services are not different enough from data to be treated differently. You have a stream of water/electricity/data sent through pipelines and switches from a source, by a provider, to your place and then you turn on the tap/outlet/web-browser use it. (I know wall-outlet electricity is AC/technically electrons shifting rapidly back and forth and not really a stream, but I think the comparison still stands). If I want to play games or communicate with a remote simulation I'm running at my uni or anything else on the Internet, it's still data sent through wire and fiber. It's the same service I require and should therefore be paid the same IMO.Same reason those opposed to it are trying so hard. Call me cynic, but when the scaremongering starts, the only thing that's sure is someone's trying to drum up support on some emotional level. I just don't believe that either side of this is on the side of giving their customers better service for lower price. Safer to assume everyone has some bias they are keeping to themselves, and I definitely would not rule out the ulterior motives of those claiming net neutrality is the thing keeping this house of cards standing.
I'm not going to deny my own bias either. My internet has steadily gotten more expensive while at the same time becoming more unreliable. If they put out a fast lane, I'd consider it depending on cost. If a slow lane, everyone would cry foul and still have FTC to complain to.
I'd rather see them break up the monopolies as needed rather than allow the monopolies as long as everyone is in the slow lane together, which they have been doing with neutrality in place, regardless of the lofty rhetoric.
Well, another difference being dying of thirst and freezing to death, as opposed to going without cat videos and social media like farming.The way I see it, these services are not different enough from data to be treated differently.
You seem to misunderstand how the Internet works.My internet has steadily gotten more expensive while at the same time becoming more unreliable. If they put out a fast lane, I'd consider it depending on cost.
This. Exactly right. An ISP's job is to provide me with a connection to the Internet. If they want to charge me more or less for a better or worse connection, then they should absolutely be able to do that. (They are able to do this even with net neutrality rules in effect).I don't pay differently for what I do with my water or electricity, I just pay for the amount I use. The way I see it, these services are not different enough from data to be treated differently.
Only fools believe there is any real competition in the ISP business.Consumer competition is a beautiful thing ... and the reason the "internet world" was humming right along pre net-neutrality. It will continue to do so. The Federal Corrupt Commission actually voted to RELEASE some of its powers for once ... who would have thought.