I want to make a very serious point. No matter what the subject. ANY subject. What you 'feel" holds absolutely no weight. It's about what you can prove. Believe what you want to believe but don't tell someone they're wrong because you feel that they are.
↑
Gather up as much information as you can then make a fuss. Having no knowledge about the subject yourself and then calling ignorance on others is very much the pot calling the kettle black.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just have to respond to the above comment posted by Egriz. Sorry but your reply resembles the emotionalism of a fanboy and not an adult that can differentiate between right and wrong. Despite all my efforts in producing facts and trying to get to the bottom of things, you merely accuse me of making a 'fuss' because I used the word 'feel'. Do I really have to prove the obvious to you? It appears so. So what is obvious? What's obvious is that Star Citizen is a business, or do I need to prove that too? What is obvious is that they have banned people because people thinking for themselves and questioning policy, direction or what have you aren't good for sales. Why else would they ban people for expressing an opinion? Oh I get it because the following is worthy of a lifetime ban without the proper requisite warnings:
'I look really forward to Matchmaking (mechanic) because it takes away the challenge of beating someone better than me and saves me from embarrassment of being beaten by someone with lesser skills.'
What more proof do I need to demonstrate that Star Citizen is first and foremost a business and unduly bias towards moderation? Is that really how 'Communities' should be governed? And what about the person who wanted to start a women's organization but was only unbanned after the media intervened? I noticed you ignored that and went with 'feel' then shot off about facts. I could go on and on about other 'facts' but I see they are wasted on you. I can now see why there is growing animosity towards Star Citizen: not because Chris Roberts over-promises and under-delivers (which he doesn't); not because ships are exorbitantly expensive; not because Star Citizen feels like a never ending money making machine; and not because of VAT. Clearly the reason for the growing backlash against Star Citizen is people like you that attack others for daring to suggest SC isn't all it's made out to be. Even those who earnestly try to find the middle ground are suspect. No, that is not enough for you. All you can do is start yelling at anyone trying to get to the truth. Yeah, I see now why there is a growing backlash towards Star Citizen - thanks for the contribution.
↑
Gather up as much information as you can then make a fuss. Having no knowledge about the subject yourself and then calling ignorance on others is very much the pot calling the kettle black.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just have to respond to the above comment posted by Egriz. Sorry but your reply resembles the emotionalism of a fanboy and not an adult that can differentiate between right and wrong. Despite all my efforts in producing facts and trying to get to the bottom of things, you merely accuse me of making a 'fuss' because I used the word 'feel'. Do I really have to prove the obvious to you? It appears so. So what is obvious? What's obvious is that Star Citizen is a business, or do I need to prove that too? What is obvious is that they have banned people because people thinking for themselves and questioning policy, direction or what have you aren't good for sales. Why else would they ban people for expressing an opinion? Oh I get it because the following is worthy of a lifetime ban without the proper requisite warnings:
'I look really forward to Matchmaking (mechanic) because it takes away the challenge of beating someone better than me and saves me from embarrassment of being beaten by someone with lesser skills.'
What more proof do I need to demonstrate that Star Citizen is first and foremost a business and unduly bias towards moderation? Is that really how 'Communities' should be governed? And what about the person who wanted to start a women's organization but was only unbanned after the media intervened? I noticed you ignored that and went with 'feel' then shot off about facts. I could go on and on about other 'facts' but I see they are wasted on you. I can now see why there is growing animosity towards Star Citizen: not because Chris Roberts over-promises and under-delivers (which he doesn't); not because ships are exorbitantly expensive; not because Star Citizen feels like a never ending money making machine; and not because of VAT. Clearly the reason for the growing backlash against Star Citizen is people like you that attack others for daring to suggest SC isn't all it's made out to be. Even those who earnestly try to find the middle ground are suspect. No, that is not enough for you. All you can do is start yelling at anyone trying to get to the truth. Yeah, I see now why there is a growing backlash towards Star Citizen - thanks for the contribution.
