delete pls

Frad in'Ryth

Vice Admiral
May 25, 2017
134
530
400
RSI Handle
FradinRyth
Aaaaah.
[TRIGGERED]
Human, mankind and man are words for everyone.
Woman and Wereman are the correct words for the genders.
Men at work, man the rigging, etc, are the correct gender neutral terms for things! Why is a forest creature using proper English?
Because socialist Canadian schools!
Wereman!?! Canada is teaching 14th century linguistics? Plus in that case wouldn't it be wereman and wifman both of which usages died out around the same time (thanks to French influences supplanting perfectly good Anglo-Saxon roots). The only common modern use of were is werewolf (manwolf) iirc.
 

CrudeSasquatch

Space Marshal
Jan 1, 2016
3,876
15,933
2,850
RSI Handle
CrudeSasquatch
Wereman!?! Canada is teaching 14th century linguistics? Plus in that case wouldn't it be wereman and wifman both of which usages died out around the same time (thanks to French influences supplanting perfectly good Anglo-Saxon roots). The only common modern use of were is werewolf (manwolf) iirc.
You can have a whiff man but puff puff pass.
And you are correct. Canada speaks 14th century English.
We blame the French!
 
Last edited:

Blind Owl

Hallucinogenic Owl
Donor
Nov 27, 2015
20,913
73,955
3,160
RSI Handle
BlindOwl
Aaaaah.
[TRIGGERED]
Human, mankind and man are words for everyone.
Woman and Wereman are the correct words for the genders.
Men at work, man the rigging, etc, are the correct gender neutral terms for things! Why is a forest creature using proper English?
Because socialist Canadian schools!
But...
But...
Peoplekind?!?
All of those terms seem to exclude avian and sasquatch kind though, so clearly they're oppressive.
I am oppressed!!
 
Forgot your password?