So, would false statistics then be more truthful than normal statistics?There are lies, and there are damned lies... and then there are statistics.
Wait... did you just ask "Can a false lie be more truthful than a normal lie?" Yeah it could be, but only statistically... That's a deep question though, I'm still trying to think of which 1004 years Rome was an Empire during.So, would false statistics then be more truthful than normal statistics?
I don't know... depends on how you manipulate the data, not sure there is a false statistic unless you have absolutely no data, The answer to all questions is #42... so if you don't know just divide by 42.So, would false statistics then be more truthful than normal statistics?
...or a bunch of false and manipulated data.I don't know... depends on how you manipulate the data, not sure there is a false statistic unless you have absolutely no data, The answer to all questions is #42... so if you don't know just divide by 42.
Cough. We actually do something like that in AI development. It's a little more complex than using a constant value, but not appreciably more difficult.I don't know... depends on how you manipulate the data, not sure there is a false statistic unless you have absolutely no data, The answer to all questions is #42... so if you don't know just divide by 42.