That's kind of you, but it's really not that much work. Stick any ship into
Hardpoint and click a component, and all the other available components come up, so you scan for the stats you want, like lowest EM, or fastest IR cooler, or fastest shield refresh, and you quickly get a strong sense of what the entire platform is capable of. Personally, I think when component swapping is out for real, we're all going to want to have on tap several choices for each component, so we can design around the mission, and this is just what CIG wants, because that means we keep buying stuff.
It also means though, that it's a special find when a platform comes with components that make it especially good at its job when all stock. The Razor EX is good stock, and though like every ship it can be made better, the fact it is so good stock means that on high risk missions you can fly it stock and not lose anything if you lose the ship. . .except your life.
BTW, the same combo of Slipstream reactor and Snowblind primary cooler hugely improves the Eclipse. So far as I know, no one has looked at just how hard to see the Eclipse can be made. It's an insanely low number--under 100 EM--and yet has more power and better cooling available than stock. Contrast that with the Raven that when customed and flown with shields and aux cooler off, has almost fifteen times the EM signature. There is no way to make the Raven so sneaky as an Eclipse or Razor, and if you're designing stealth assault wings, you need to know this. Fact is the Sentinel is almost as sneaky as the Raven, so why would you want a Raven? BTW, even the Mantis is hard as hell to see when equipped with Slipstream and Snowblind. Whod'a thunk it can have an EM sig as low as the Eclipse--but it can! That affects how you plan to use it.
I'm disappointed that somehow HP skipped over the Nautilus, but has the Mantis which came out later. Stealthing bigger ships is going to be more complex, methinks.