I don't think the original had a rear facing remote turret. . .but I like it!
Might be waiting for awhile.I can't wait.
I remember when they had the competition https://robertsspaceindustries.com/contest/the-next-great-starship/Might be waiting for awhile
Oh man. I almost feel like CIG isn't really working on the ship because CR doesn't really care for it. Having the community vote on a ship was more of a gimmick.I remember when they had the competition https://robertsspaceindustries.com/contest/the-next-great-starship/
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTE_nJWiU4w
How many more years? LOL... probably 10 at this rate.
@Phil , was yours 1 of the original concept sales with LTI by chance?I had bought this ship originally, but after years of being forgotten I melted it. Now I almost have a sour taste in my mouth whenever its brought up lol. Looks good, but until I hear a date or something remotely like a timelines as to when it gets done, I will let the BBT sit and collect dust.
Unfortunately no, I have some LTI upgrades I have been using.@Phil , was yours 1 of the original concept sales with LTI by chance?
The problem is in part that the Aegis style guide emerged as a thing after this design. The other Aegis ships already shared enough in common that the brand came together, but this really looks more MISC to me. Still, seems they are pursuing it. This was in the 3.9.1 leaks. I'm shocked it appears they're leaving the engines in. I'll be more shocked if they stay.Oh man. I almost feel like CIG isn't really working on the ship because CR doesn't really care for it. Having the community vote on a ship was more of a gimmick.
Yeah I agree. Chris simply does not feel the design fits with the rest of the line.Oh man. I almost feel like CIG isn't really working on the ship because CR doesn't really care for it. Having the community vote on a ship was more of a gimmick.