Current stats on an S10 is that it can hit 15km out with 10,000 alpha. :D
Ouch! That's gonna hurt.Current stats on an S10 is that it can hit 15km out with 10,000 alpha. :D
Sounds like my Aurora.Current stats on an S10 is that it can hit 15km out with 10,000 alpha. :D
Trying to get into as rhythm here. With the kids back in school, I can get my mornings free to put out a video.@Montoya... you are on a content tear (very good thing)! I like the ideas... as you said, they can be tweaked as needed and having an idea is better than no ideas at all.
That's using your Aurora as ammunition.Sounds like my Aurora.
Say your car got hit with a howitzer... would it survive. That said howitzers are not that accurate to hit moving targets, well, lets look at real tech, https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a33971111/us-army-howitzer-shoots-down-simulated-missile/ ... moving forward the imagination is the only limit... although I would argue that shields are pretty out there... nano bots are not.We all know that from time to time, somebody will be treating that cannon's barrel like the classic blazing saddles portion with the bomb.
I think once you see how it's is being implemented, it will make much more sense to you. And as a point, did you ever run Pirate swarm after they first brought the Connie's into it? Those 2 turrets were *DEADLY* as the NPC's were getting near 95% hit rate and were quickly nerfed. So the gunnery isn't an issue.. they can balance it where they want. How the Law portion of it will play out is a more interesting question, and where I think the exploits will show up.I've read the post from Molly and it is interesting also a S10 turret I assume it cnould easily get rid of any ship currently in game in 1-2 shot...
I've some concern 'tho about the effectivness of the system: currently turrets are "not very accurate" (aka they shoot almost random) I hope they fix that otherwise the defese system will be an extreamly expensive firework shooter.
The post olso only mention reststop, I wonder if Mollly generally mean all space station (including space port) or only proper reaststop: in the first case I fear PO will became a complete lawless area: there is no way the current PO will support that amount of firepower required by this system.
I was meaning it in reference to this:Say your car got hit with a howitzer... would it survive. That said howitzers are not that accurate to hit moving targets, well, lets look at real tech, https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a33971111/us-army-howitzer-shoots-down-simulated-missile/ ... moving forward the imagination is the only limit... although I would argue that shields are pretty out there... nano bots are not.
I agree, but I simply had to make the point. On that note, I wish BAE should be banned from the US based on their track record with veterans. I know you are thinking, where the hell did that come from.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-15949418.I was meaning it in reference to this:
Ah, that makes sense & I agree with the Sgt in that article. It's a well known & documented fact that the Pakistani gov't & military support terrorist organizations, which was proven when the US SEAL Team 6 eliminated Osama Bin Laden inside his compound in Pakistan. This BAE don't need to be banned from the US though, they deserve to be put on trial for treason against the US as well as war crimes for rendering support to terrorists. In this case though, I'd settle for taking ALL of their leadership that thought it would be a wise investment to sell to those with ties to terrorist groups, dislocate all of the joints in their limbs & feet them to hungry hogs while they're alive. Make a severe example of them. Then again, I'm just a fluffy & fuzzy Ewok looking person. I have no authority in anything, but I am honest to a fault.I agree, but I simply had to make the point. On that note, I wish BAE should be banned from the US based on their track record with veterans. I know you are thinking, where the hell did that come from.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-15949418.
I think the smaller turret (S7...small...yeah...) are there for that reason: if the hostile ship came to close to be effectivly engage by the bug gunz then there is a forest of small turret to take care of them, they maybe provede a great treat as a single turret, but large number that's another story....
I'd expect ships to need to drop out of Quantum a heck of a lot further out than they are at the moment for the station S10's to be effective though. Like an Arrow blowing the parts off a Connie, if a ship gets close enough to the station and starts to orbit it, it will be able to just evade those big slow guns. I suppose that's where the security forces ships will come into it, though...?