Everybody here simply stopped caring, now they miss us
I agree, but I also never thought the game would expand in scope to the massive beast it has become. I am still concerned that it's attempting to achieve too much but then @Montoya posts a video about how much new revenue they have taken in and I realize it's still being fed and they are still making large improvements to the game.There isn't a SINGLE original backer who thought we'd be at the end of 2021, and only have 3 basic gameplay loops. Not one.
Valid criticisms are valid. Blind hate or whining is something different entirely.
Yeah. You have the recognize all of it. The good and the bad.I agree, but I also never thought the game would expand in scope to the massive beast it has become. I am still concerned that it's attempting to achieve too much but then @Montoya posts a video about how much new revenue they have taken in and I realize it's still being fed and they are still making large improvements to the game.
I respectfully disagree for the sake of boosting algorithms & challenge whoever to a digital drinking contest in the most TESTified manner. (while knowing that I'll still probably lose.) Cheers!View attachment 21827
Very Nice!
You did the right thing by starting a fight, it increases interactions, good for the algorithm!
The irony is that its other gamers, all looking for the next great game that are fighting in the comments.I read between the lines Great Leader.
I opened the video in the facetubeappthing, liked it, then tried to start a fight in your comments.
"Why" not just call him a game critic, as that propaganda outlet mainly criticizes things that they are willfully ignorant of because those things don't abide by their chosen "narratives".Great video! Excellent point about that dude believing his ignorance is just as valuable, or more valuable than a knowledgable person's expertise about the game.
I wonder if he books flights and demands that the pilots know ZERO about flying? lol
In my opinion, calling that blogger "a journalist" is quite a stretch...and an insult to real journalists out there, who do ask tough questions! Maybe just calling him a "writer" or "video game reviewer" would be more on point? There is a trick we use to get people to think about root causes/getting to the bottom of things, it's called "asking 'why' five times." It's gotten a bit over-used by now, but the idea and the method is still powerful. I would suggest that dude ask why SC has raised $400 million while still in alpha, and then ask "why" four more times...but face it, he and the other "writers" are just feeding an algorithm and want to shove out as much crap as possible, as quickly as possible, so they can go wank or something.