Hello and welcome.
This thread is one of those few threads where I require you sober, so we can have a good healthy conversation.
Disclaimer: This thread is not targeted against any one single individual, this is purely an attempt to establish an organization-wide agreement upon what kind of chat belongs where and when.
Rules/Etiquette on mumble as of right now (written ad hoc):
1. Push-to-talk enforced in general chat
2. Don't put in racist pictures or text in your comment, temporary chat description or title.
3. Don't directly flame another test member
Right now that's all we really enforce, as people tend to be able to behave and make the overall experience a plus.
Officially we've said that we follow the rules stated on RSI - those rules however are extremely strict and allows for very, very wide and subjective interpretation - basically everything can be an offense. See the rules here: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/86002/forum-rules-moderator-responsibilities-updated-11-26-14#latest
In my humble opinion, if we truly do follow those rules, I will not only have to ban myself permanently, but I will have to ban nearly everyone I've spoken to.
I believe this is a Montoya quote: "We do not tell you how to play the game, we just provide the environment and atmosphere to make it better!"
We've sold the organization as free-minded, both in gameplay, but also chat-wise as we've catered to drunks :p, so there's a place and time for everything, which contradicts the rules of RSI - also I've been requested multiple members on multiple occasions to enforce moderation on people that are against the rules of RSI, (which still everything basically is) but I am hesitant to do so because we stand in a dilemma where our "freedom of speech" is compromised if we truly do so.
Why are you here?
I would like to start a discussion about what kind of community you want to have here in test? How free-minded are we, are there limits? When does the freedom of one overshadow the freedom of another?
I will monitor the responses on this thread.
This discussion is made with mumble in mind, knowing we have a Drunk tank, aka our R18-chatroom.
A member approached me and said that they did not think chatting about drugs is okay.
Having a lenient rule-set, I have to ask why is it not okay? When is it excessive? Is all drug chat banned? Should they be moved to Drunk Tank? When should they be moved to Drunk Tank?
Is Drunk Tank just an R18-rated chat, or is it for chat that we frown upon?
Maybe to further spark a fruitful conversation, you can see a short little discussion I started on RSI-test-chat with two other members:
(9:18:09 AM) Shive: Someone wants it to be so that, if you talk about drugs you should be moved to drunk tank on mumble.
(9:18:11 AM) Shive: Thoughts?
(9:18:28 AM) bdg: im american
(9:18:34 AM) bdg: freespeech and bald eagles
(9:18:41 AM) bdg: let em talk about whatever they want
(9:20:30 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Man, drugs is drugs. People gonna drug, I don't care if people drug, what they do is their business. But when people wank on about drugging, like in /r/trees as if they are so enlightened, shit gets old fast
(9:21:10 AM) bdg: its not like people in the chat are at the mercy of whoever is talking
(9:21:17 AM) bdg: they have the power to change the conversation
(9:21:35 AM) bdg: no need for administrative intervention if change is already in the user's power
(9:22:50 AM) Shive: Okay cool :)
(9:22:57 AM) Shive: I think so too
(9:23:06 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Tru that.
(9:23:23 AM) Shive: But gotta ask around :O it's hard to speak on behalf of others
(9:23:31 AM) bdg: it's good that u did
(9:23:35 AM) bdg: very democratic and shit
(9:24:45 AM) Shive: That's me
(9:24:50 AM) Shive: Shive the care-taker
(9:24:58 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Yeah. I mean I can understand that it makes some people uncomfortable, and people that are made uncomfartable by that conversation will probably be the type of people that have trouble changing the conversation
(9:25:14 AM) that_frog_kurtis: But it's not like they have to be in mumble either.
(9:25:35 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Adults gonna adult
(9:26:05 AM) bdg: should not have drank coffee at 2am
(9:26:07 AM) Shive: That said, it's not a society we have here, it's a community, and we actually have the power to shape it the way we want
(9:26:08 AM) bdg: not gonna lie
(9:26:10 AM) Shive: I'm not saying it is
(9:26:25 AM) Shive: but imagine, if 50% of test chat was people in prison
(9:26:37 AM) Shive: imagine how broken the conversations would be
(9:26:49 AM) Shive: That was pretty presumptious of me to say like that, but please roll with it
(9:27:00 AM) Shive: What chance does the last 50% have?
(9:27:08 AM) Shive: I'm pretty sure it would cater to so few people
(9:27:16 AM) Shive: that the prison-minded people would take over
(9:27:19 AM) Shive: and push the others out
(9:27:25 AM) Shive: even though they have the power to speak up
(9:27:45 AM) Shive: I'm not saying you're a bad person because you've done drugs or do them
(9:27:45 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Just have a R18 channel for bullshitting. Or is that what the drunk tank is?
(9:28:01 AM) Shive: Drunk tank is for when you wanna talk about sexy time :p
(9:28:11 AM) Shive: Yes
(9:28:17 AM) Shive: Drunk tank is the R18 chat
(9:28:29 AM) Shive: The argument was
(9:28:34 AM) Audax Phidippus left the room.
(9:28:35 AM) Shive: We have kids coming through general chat from time to time
(9:28:37 AM) Shive: new members
(9:28:44 AM) Shive: Is this really the first we want them to see?
(9:28:55 AM) bdg: by kids
(9:28:57 AM) Shive: Does it make for a nice community? Is this what you want the chat to be talking about?
(9:29:01 AM) bdg: what do you mean?
(9:29:14 AM) Shive: Youngest member I know of that is registered
(9:29:15 AM) that_frog_kurtis: >18
(9:29:16 AM) Shive: is 11
(9:29:20 AM) Shive: but onwards
(9:29:24 AM) Shive: 13 is gonna be the lowest
(9:29:32 AM) bdg: i think it's fine
(9:29:50 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Yeah, or just people without headphones who may have younger family around
(9:29:56 AM) Shive: But we can also differentiate between etiquette and rules
(9:30:43 AM) bdg: this is getting pretty philosophical, but let's take RSI general chat (forum) as an example
(9:30:49 AM) Shive: Sure
(9:30:57 AM) bdg: would you consider the community nice? i wouldn't
(9:31:03 AM) bdg: however that place is still highly moderated
(9:31:05 AM) that_frog_kurtis: I think having some PG standards in general is fine if the drunk tank is there to cater for the other fuckers
(9:31:34 AM) bdg: it's all about the people not the moderation
(9:31:38 AM) bdg: we have a good crowd here
(9:32:03 AM) Shive: That's exactly my point bdg, while I agree with what you guys said earlier
(9:32:08 AM) Shive: I can't help but be a little bit worried
(9:32:16 AM) Shive: if our softies are pushed away
(9:32:24 AM) Shive: in favour of R18-chatting people
(9:32:31 AM) Shive: does that affect our community?
(9:32:33 AM) Shive: if so how?
(9:32:35 AM) Shive: Do we want this?
(9:33:14 AM) bdg: yeah that is a real dilemna
(9:33:25 AM) Shive: That said, I go full R18 myself sometimes
(9:33:36 AM) Shive: But I do my best to moderate myself
(9:33:40 AM) that_frog_kurtis: I don't think anyone would be too worried with some standards being put in place, so long as it wasn't nazi control. Let people get a bit rowdy and if it continues then move them down
(9:33:50 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Anyway, pub time.
(9:33:53 AM) that_frog_kurtis: seeyas
(9:33:58 AM) Shive: Cya froggy
(9:34:02 AM) Shive: thx for the chat
Please be respectful as always people and note that when speaking about groups of people other test members are bound to be part of those groups, so don't make anyone feel unnecessarily headhunted, thanks.
This thread is one of those few threads where I require you sober, so we can have a good healthy conversation.
Disclaimer: This thread is not targeted against any one single individual, this is purely an attempt to establish an organization-wide agreement upon what kind of chat belongs where and when.
Rules/Etiquette on mumble as of right now (written ad hoc):
1. Push-to-talk enforced in general chat
2. Don't put in racist pictures or text in your comment, temporary chat description or title.
3. Don't directly flame another test member
Right now that's all we really enforce, as people tend to be able to behave and make the overall experience a plus.
Officially we've said that we follow the rules stated on RSI - those rules however are extremely strict and allows for very, very wide and subjective interpretation - basically everything can be an offense. See the rules here: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/86002/forum-rules-moderator-responsibilities-updated-11-26-14#latest
In my humble opinion, if we truly do follow those rules, I will not only have to ban myself permanently, but I will have to ban nearly everyone I've spoken to.
I believe this is a Montoya quote: "We do not tell you how to play the game, we just provide the environment and atmosphere to make it better!"
We've sold the organization as free-minded, both in gameplay, but also chat-wise as we've catered to drunks :p, so there's a place and time for everything, which contradicts the rules of RSI - also I've been requested multiple members on multiple occasions to enforce moderation on people that are against the rules of RSI, (which still everything basically is) but I am hesitant to do so because we stand in a dilemma where our "freedom of speech" is compromised if we truly do so.
Why are you here?
I would like to start a discussion about what kind of community you want to have here in test? How free-minded are we, are there limits? When does the freedom of one overshadow the freedom of another?
I will monitor the responses on this thread.
This discussion is made with mumble in mind, knowing we have a Drunk tank, aka our R18-chatroom.
A member approached me and said that they did not think chatting about drugs is okay.
Having a lenient rule-set, I have to ask why is it not okay? When is it excessive? Is all drug chat banned? Should they be moved to Drunk Tank? When should they be moved to Drunk Tank?
Is Drunk Tank just an R18-rated chat, or is it for chat that we frown upon?
Maybe to further spark a fruitful conversation, you can see a short little discussion I started on RSI-test-chat with two other members:
(9:18:09 AM) Shive: Someone wants it to be so that, if you talk about drugs you should be moved to drunk tank on mumble.
(9:18:11 AM) Shive: Thoughts?
(9:18:28 AM) bdg: im american
(9:18:34 AM) bdg: freespeech and bald eagles
(9:18:41 AM) bdg: let em talk about whatever they want
(9:20:30 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Man, drugs is drugs. People gonna drug, I don't care if people drug, what they do is their business. But when people wank on about drugging, like in /r/trees as if they are so enlightened, shit gets old fast
(9:21:10 AM) bdg: its not like people in the chat are at the mercy of whoever is talking
(9:21:17 AM) bdg: they have the power to change the conversation
(9:21:35 AM) bdg: no need for administrative intervention if change is already in the user's power
(9:22:50 AM) Shive: Okay cool :)
(9:22:57 AM) Shive: I think so too
(9:23:06 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Tru that.
(9:23:23 AM) Shive: But gotta ask around :O it's hard to speak on behalf of others
(9:23:31 AM) bdg: it's good that u did
(9:23:35 AM) bdg: very democratic and shit
(9:24:45 AM) Shive: That's me
(9:24:50 AM) Shive: Shive the care-taker
(9:24:58 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Yeah. I mean I can understand that it makes some people uncomfortable, and people that are made uncomfartable by that conversation will probably be the type of people that have trouble changing the conversation
(9:25:14 AM) that_frog_kurtis: But it's not like they have to be in mumble either.
(9:25:35 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Adults gonna adult
(9:26:05 AM) bdg: should not have drank coffee at 2am
(9:26:07 AM) Shive: That said, it's not a society we have here, it's a community, and we actually have the power to shape it the way we want
(9:26:08 AM) bdg: not gonna lie
(9:26:10 AM) Shive: I'm not saying it is
(9:26:25 AM) Shive: but imagine, if 50% of test chat was people in prison
(9:26:37 AM) Shive: imagine how broken the conversations would be
(9:26:49 AM) Shive: That was pretty presumptious of me to say like that, but please roll with it
(9:27:00 AM) Shive: What chance does the last 50% have?
(9:27:08 AM) Shive: I'm pretty sure it would cater to so few people
(9:27:16 AM) Shive: that the prison-minded people would take over
(9:27:19 AM) Shive: and push the others out
(9:27:25 AM) Shive: even though they have the power to speak up
(9:27:45 AM) Shive: I'm not saying you're a bad person because you've done drugs or do them
(9:27:45 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Just have a R18 channel for bullshitting. Or is that what the drunk tank is?
(9:28:01 AM) Shive: Drunk tank is for when you wanna talk about sexy time :p
(9:28:11 AM) Shive: Yes
(9:28:17 AM) Shive: Drunk tank is the R18 chat
(9:28:29 AM) Shive: The argument was
(9:28:34 AM) Audax Phidippus left the room.
(9:28:35 AM) Shive: We have kids coming through general chat from time to time
(9:28:37 AM) Shive: new members
(9:28:44 AM) Shive: Is this really the first we want them to see?
(9:28:55 AM) bdg: by kids
(9:28:57 AM) Shive: Does it make for a nice community? Is this what you want the chat to be talking about?
(9:29:01 AM) bdg: what do you mean?
(9:29:14 AM) Shive: Youngest member I know of that is registered
(9:29:15 AM) that_frog_kurtis: >18
(9:29:16 AM) Shive: is 11
(9:29:20 AM) Shive: but onwards
(9:29:24 AM) Shive: 13 is gonna be the lowest
(9:29:32 AM) bdg: i think it's fine
(9:29:50 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Yeah, or just people without headphones who may have younger family around
(9:29:56 AM) Shive: But we can also differentiate between etiquette and rules
(9:30:43 AM) bdg: this is getting pretty philosophical, but let's take RSI general chat (forum) as an example
(9:30:49 AM) Shive: Sure
(9:30:57 AM) bdg: would you consider the community nice? i wouldn't
(9:31:03 AM) bdg: however that place is still highly moderated
(9:31:05 AM) that_frog_kurtis: I think having some PG standards in general is fine if the drunk tank is there to cater for the other fuckers
(9:31:34 AM) bdg: it's all about the people not the moderation
(9:31:38 AM) bdg: we have a good crowd here
(9:32:03 AM) Shive: That's exactly my point bdg, while I agree with what you guys said earlier
(9:32:08 AM) Shive: I can't help but be a little bit worried
(9:32:16 AM) Shive: if our softies are pushed away
(9:32:24 AM) Shive: in favour of R18-chatting people
(9:32:31 AM) Shive: does that affect our community?
(9:32:33 AM) Shive: if so how?
(9:32:35 AM) Shive: Do we want this?
(9:33:14 AM) bdg: yeah that is a real dilemna
(9:33:25 AM) Shive: That said, I go full R18 myself sometimes
(9:33:36 AM) Shive: But I do my best to moderate myself
(9:33:40 AM) that_frog_kurtis: I don't think anyone would be too worried with some standards being put in place, so long as it wasn't nazi control. Let people get a bit rowdy and if it continues then move them down
(9:33:50 AM) that_frog_kurtis: Anyway, pub time.
(9:33:53 AM) that_frog_kurtis: seeyas
(9:33:58 AM) Shive: Cya froggy
(9:34:02 AM) Shive: thx for the chat
Please be respectful as always people and note that when speaking about groups of people other test members are bound to be part of those groups, so don't make anyone feel unnecessarily headhunted, thanks.