Search results

According to Erin Roberts, at an Asian Bar Citizen last summer, Squadron 42 was more than 2 years out. I see that getting further away, given CIG's track record, not nearer.

The big point being made is "enough of the feature creep."

I think the ba k seat is for lockdown mode, and there is no function for someone in the back seat. The only reason to force the systems into the hands of a second crewperson is because CIG hasn't made the ui capable of handlingmore than 2 triggers.

The Hawk, Mantis, Warlock, Cutlass Blue, and Sentinel don't need a second person to operate their EMP or Quantum Enforcement devices, Why should this?

That doesn't make any sense. Are the Warlock and the Hawk getting second seats?

I'm not really seeing tracks there, given the nature of the knee joint. That design doesn't fit an operator given the hip joints of the vehicle (on the right) in spite the 2D overlay on the left.

Given the size of the ship interiors and environments in Star Citizens, this is what the "Titan" armor should be. Or this:

What they're showing only fits in a Tali prone, if it fits at all.

Play? I thought we were here to find people to drink and talk shit with. Have I been doing it wrong?

This is the game with stock smuggling compartments in ships and mines in empty 3D space. I wouldn't put too much stock in logic with CIG. It's all about the "rule of cool" and selling specialized ships for specialized purposes.

Grenades

I think it is highly likely the second seat is obsolete.

Looks like CIG is trying, as usual, to get people to chase the Meta with real money.

Been done with spending money for a year. If more people stopped spending money CIG might actually be forced to do something they appear to have no interest in doing, release a game.

https://testsquadron.com/threads/divisions-of-test-squadron.15044/ Apparently yes, but the divisions are on hold.

If you are Concierge you can always ask CIG to let you buy them.

Do what you want, I'm not trying to push you into anything.

I'm at 2100 and without serious changes at CIG that is where it ends. My better half is just over 980 and that is stopping there as well.

That doesn't excuse Star Citizen's timeframe.

Whether there was a big bang or not has long been disputed. Most of the debate is about how many hydrogen atoms are in the universe. If it is less than 10^80 then the big bang model is likely correct. If it is more than 10^80 then it is more likely to be a cyclic expand, contract, expand...