Search results

They say they won't in the terms on the site. If they will, I'll take it. I've asked, we'll see what happens.

The only return I was looking for was a produced game.

If it releases in my lifetime I'll be surprised. If it does I might take a look at it. If not, then it doesn't.

I no longer believe it will ever get anywhere.

Original pitch video CR announced they spent over a year in development to get to the kickstarter launch.

I'm fed up with the nonsense coming out of CIG. The lack of being able to hit their own self imposed deadlines. The lack of transparency. The lack of build discipline, which is the only explanation for the amount of regression bugs. The lack of a clear definition of what "done" looks like. The...

The interior fits in the top down orthographic projection. The angle on the exterior, especially in the room at the front, near the cockpit, doesn't allow for the full height walls in the interior. Just thinking about force reactions being applied as someone traverses that hallway, and the...

It's there today. Thanks guys.

If you look at Sara's original concept work, the inside doesn't fit in the outside. The most obvious point is the room next to the cockpit. The only part of the new MSR I dislike is the servers in the entry hall. If they put the chair in the deadend part of the hallway, and the servers in the...

Thanks

Has anyone got the Citizencon gear in their hangar yet? I just checked my hangar and it isn't there yet. I'm just trying to figure out if I need to file a ticket.

The front "wheels" are further apart than the end of the ramp, at least last time I checked.

I looked there, and checked each of his posts, which is why I asked which you were referring to. No worries.

If it was as far along as they tried to imply, 3.18. I was, personally thinking it belonged in 3.19, but 3.18 or 3.20 would work. The HUD has required a rework since 2.5 (at the latest) and needs to get rid of the flash. They have a working HUD, just use that and differentiate in later...

I agree, especially the "let's see it," part.

They have ship archtypes for intended roles. That is already done. That is all they need, they can differentiate and balance in iterations (like they were supposed to do after 3.14). In the mean time, like "low speed combat" and the "apocalyptic change" shouldn't they be finding out if the...

We have space combat now without those systems fleshed out. Adding those systems will flesh out space combat in an iterative way. The annual rewriting the entire flight system has definitely gotten old.

My mistake. I misunderstood them talking about circle straffing large ships. Nose to nose DPS race circle straffing is at least as boring as jousting, and uninteresting. That is not "positional combat," or "choices that matter." There are much more interesting options, but Star Citizen seems...

The HUD, change doesn't really enter into the new flight model. Which comment are you referring to, other than him saying they were doing SQ42 ships first?

Well, technically, since the Cutlass ramp is trapezoidal not rectangular, the Cyclone doesn't fit there either. The Collison mesh is more rectangular so the Cyclone can get onto the ramp, where is shouldn't be capable of doing that.