45% faster using 75% less power. Whoda thunk it possible?
7nm chips came to market in less than a year. It's important to rush because the competition is usually just right behind, and if you can beat them by an entire year you can own the market.
"75% less power" is especially interesting in that it may be suitable to break the 5Ghz wall. Brave new world.
amd is going to have to make the 2nm processors before they can compete to lower prices of the next gen. with that said though the current generation is going to probably break down alot if intel sells the 2nm at an affordable price. i'm banking on amd to get 2nm fast since they are right behind the curve with intel these days.AMD: “What am I, chopped liver?!”
10 000 nm
1 500 nm
|15% of previous|
|40% of previous|
|21% of previous|
|21% of previous|
|14% of previous|
The problem up to now has been the ability to control the transistor size. There have been successful laboratory tests of 1.2 and 1 nm, but we now think that is the basic limit of silicon. 1nm is only 20 silicon atoms wide, and it becomes difficult to create a transistor smaller than that - because the electrons in the material begin to be affected by their quantum properties. You can make the transistor smaller, but you can't control where the electrons are, and they can leak across the transistor base and even between transistors. In a digital system, that means 0's can randomly become 1's, and 1's can randomly become 0's.These manufacturers keep talking of walls and barriers that stop them from making smaller semiconductors, but somehow every 10 years without fail they've managed to trim like 80% of the size. 1991 being an exception.
Don't hold your breath. The quantum processors they currently have are the size of a refrigerator and operate at temperatures like .1 degree above absolute 0. They do amazing things though, like calculate in a second what the fastest silicon based supercomputers take a week to process. But the technology is starting to see industrial applications now so development will accelerate.But I'm still waiting for advanced quantum computing in a positronic network
It is indeed amazing stuff. I'd be interested to learn more about how well it can be hardened against space radiation. There's no industry so affected by the need for smaller, lighter using less power than aerospace.
If the purpose of the radiation hardening is to ensure proper operation of computer systems, one way theyre already doing that is through triple redundancy. Maybe you could also build the chip to compensate for errors caused by radiation? I'd be surprised if that too wasnt already the case.Most space radiaton hardened transistors are made from silicon carbide or gallium nitride. In general what you want is a substrate with a high band gap. Carbon forms like nanotubes, graphene and the like don't have well understood bandgaps. They can be modulated and current studies are exploring this, but short answer is yes. It appears carbon nanotubes show promise for next generation transistors, if you can say that while saying we don't know enough about carbon yet.
My point though was that 2nm transistors need to be characterized for endurance with space radiation. In general, the smaller the transistor, the more vulnerable it is to radiation of many types. However, it is also more easily and cheaply protected from radiation. So, needs to be looked at.