Just found this vid comparing these exploration ships. Since the Zeus reveal I’m waiting with baited breath on the ES, as it seems to address the few things I’m not crazy about with the 400i. The vid’s analysis is fair but misses some important points.
First, it appears the ES will have a significant edge with its S3 radar. The only other ship this size I’m aware of planned to have a large radar is the RSI Apollo. As one who is always hoping to see before being seen, this is a key feature to me. It is competing with the nice cartography table in the 400i, but we don’t know yet whether that’s going to actually generate gameplay, so the jury is out on this distinction.
Second big issue for me is the 400i runs 1 S3 shield, while the ES runs 4 S2 shields. Big difference. As many may recall, there are no S3 stealth components. Most of the time the 400i needs to fly with its shield off in order to “keep it secret; keep it safe.” It appears the ES may be able to manage some stealth with one or more shields on, and S2 shields ramp up to power much more quickly, as well as restore injuries much faster. If the ES has reactor shielding comparable to the excellent shielding in the 400i, it could turn out to be an even better stealth ship.
Finally, I’ll just put aesthetics and function together. Though I like the two level deck plan of the 400i, I’m not much the luxury guy and the ES is going to be faster and easier to navigate. This matters especially if you’re running caves solo, busting bunkers, or just making quick mission stops. I kinda prefer the simpler, less attractive, more boring deckplan of the ES.
So, just early thoughts. I’m excited to see another ship come into this class. The C1 is not really an explorer. You need to compare to the MSR, and though it has a lot to recommend it (especially including better range), it can’t be stealthed, so it’s not on my short list. Maybe the Zeus, though.
View: https://youtu.be/enDINLK7cao?si=JI-oQbXv4DletYW6
First, it appears the ES will have a significant edge with its S3 radar. The only other ship this size I’m aware of planned to have a large radar is the RSI Apollo. As one who is always hoping to see before being seen, this is a key feature to me. It is competing with the nice cartography table in the 400i, but we don’t know yet whether that’s going to actually generate gameplay, so the jury is out on this distinction.
Second big issue for me is the 400i runs 1 S3 shield, while the ES runs 4 S2 shields. Big difference. As many may recall, there are no S3 stealth components. Most of the time the 400i needs to fly with its shield off in order to “keep it secret; keep it safe.” It appears the ES may be able to manage some stealth with one or more shields on, and S2 shields ramp up to power much more quickly, as well as restore injuries much faster. If the ES has reactor shielding comparable to the excellent shielding in the 400i, it could turn out to be an even better stealth ship.
Finally, I’ll just put aesthetics and function together. Though I like the two level deck plan of the 400i, I’m not much the luxury guy and the ES is going to be faster and easier to navigate. This matters especially if you’re running caves solo, busting bunkers, or just making quick mission stops. I kinda prefer the simpler, less attractive, more boring deckplan of the ES.
So, just early thoughts. I’m excited to see another ship come into this class. The C1 is not really an explorer. You need to compare to the MSR, and though it has a lot to recommend it (especially including better range), it can’t be stealthed, so it’s not on my short list. Maybe the Zeus, though.