Mining Head information

Black Sunder

Rock Raiders
Officer
Jun 19, 2014
8,270
26,834
3,045
RSI Handle
Black_Sunder
Read these over and then on a gut feeling level post what 2 lasers you'd use together in tandem or individually and then what 3 lasers you'd put together(either to mine separately, a pair, or all 3 together or some combo thereof) to mine with.

Mining Heads
S1 Head Type/NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge
Window Size
ResistanceInstability
Dampening
Power TransferOptimal Charge
Rate
Catastrophic
Charge Rate
All Charge
Rates
Throttle Respons-
iveness Delay
Shatter
Damage
Extraction
Throughput
Consumable
Slots
Lancet MH1 Mining Laser30m150m-50%+30%1200-30%0.45 SCU/s3
Arbor MH1 Mining Laser30m150m14000.35 SCU/s0
Hofstede-S1 Mining Laser15m75m+50%20000.35 SCU/s0
Klein-S1 Mining Laser30m150m-10%-50%25000.35 SCU/s0
Impact I Mining Laser30m150m-20%3000+20%+100%+50%0.45 SCU/s1
Helix I Mining Laser37.5m187.5+30%-20%+50%3000+30%-50%+150%0.50 SCU/s3

Lancet Mining Laser- "Greycat classifies the Lancet MH1 as a support laser best utilized when mining with others. Generating a weaker than average beam, the Lancet safely heats deposits to reduce their resistance and instability but struggles to shatter them on its own. For mining crews, it's an ideal support laser to use alongside other lasers heads."

Arbor Mining Laser- "The Arbor MH1 became the universe's most heralded mining laser head thanks to Greycat Industrial's exacting standards and business prowess. The laser head's solid, reliable design found favor among industrial and solo operations for effectively balancing speed and safety. Greycat capitalized on this reputation by securing exclusive contracts that made the Arbor MH1 the standard laser head on most mining ships."

Hofstede Mining Laser- "Built with safety in mind, the Hofstede S1 sacrifices range and focuses on dampening a deposit's instability to make it safer to mine. Miners looking to decrease the chance of a catastrophic explosion should turn to this reliable and affordable mining laser head from Shubin."

Klein Mining Laser- "Shubin designed the Klein S1 to generate a powerful laser that makes mining faster. This increased speed incurs additional risk by boosting a deposit's instability and chance of exploding, but if used correctly, the Klein can quickly reap rewards for the careful miner."

Impact Mining Laser- "Mine difficult deposits easier and faster with the Impact I. Thermyte Concern created special focus lenses to increase the laser's power and provide the precision required for a larger optimal charge window. This powerful mining laser head does require careful management, as deposits will overheat quicker and explode with more force."

Helix Mining Laser- "Thermyte Concern engineered the Helix I to be a mining laser impressive power and increased range to make it ideal when dealing with difficult deposits. Yet, all this power can be dangerous, as it also slows the throttle's responsiveness and increases the intensity of explosions. To some, the effective use of the Helix I has become a sign of a true mining professional."

S2 Head Type/NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge
Window Size
ResistanceInstability
Dampening
Power TransferOptimal Charge
Rate
Catastrophic
Charge Rate
All Charge
Rates
Throttle Respons-
iveness Delay
Shatter
Damage
Extraction
Throughput
Consumable
Slots
Lancet MH2 Mining Laser60m300m-50%+30%1200-30%0.45 SCU/s3
Arbor MH2 Mining Laser60m300m14000.35 SCU/s0
Hofstede-S2 Mining Laser45m225m+50%20000.35 SCU/s0
Klein-S2 Mining Laser60m300m-10%-50%25000.35 SCU/s0
Impact II Mining Laser60m300m-20%3000+20%+100%+50%0.45 SCU/s1
Helix II Mining Laser75m375m+30%-20%+50%3000+30%-50%+150%0.50 SCU/s3

Lancet Mining Laser- "Greycat classifies the Lancet MH2 as a support laser best utilized when mining with others. Generating a weaker than average beam, the Lancet safely heats deposits to reduce their resistance and instability but struggles to shatter them on its own. For mining crews, it's an ideal support laser to use alongside other lasers heads."

Arbor Mining Laser- The Arbor MH2 is the size two version of greycat's heralded Arbor mining laser series. Like the smaller variant, the Arbor MH2's solid, reliable design found favor among industrial and solo operations for effectively balancing speed and safety.

Hofstede Mining Laser- "Built with safety in mind, the Hofstede S2 sacrifices range and focuses on dampening a deposit's instability to make it safer to mine. Miners looking to decrease the chance of a catastrophic explosion should turn to this reliable and affordable size two mining laser head from Shubin.

Klein Mining Laser- Shubin designed the Klein S2 to generate a powerful laser that makes mining faster. This increased speed incurs additional risk by boosting a deposit's instability and chance of exploding, but if used correctly, this side two mining laser can quickly reap rewards for the careful miner.

Impact Mining Laser- Mine difficult deposits easier and faster with the Impact II. Thermyte Concern created special focus lenses to increase the laser's power and provide the precision required for a larger optimal charge window. This powerful mining laser head does require careful management, as deposits will overheat quicker and explode with more force.

Helix Mining Laser- Thermyte Concern engineered the Helix II to be a mining laser head with impressive power and increased range to make it ideal when dealing with difficult deposits. Yet, all this power can be dangerous, as it also slows the throttle's responsiveness and increases the intensity of explosions. To some, the effective use of this size two laser has become a sign of a true mining professional.
 
Last edited:

Makimera

Vice Admiral
Oct 27, 2019
69
291
400
RSI Handle
Maki
so what would be the recomanded laser to use on a solo prospector?

and what would be the recomanded on a mole?
The Lancet seems like a good one on moles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knucklesdeep

Black Sunder

Rock Raiders
Officer
Jun 19, 2014
8,270
26,834
3,045
RSI Handle
Black_Sunder
so what would be the recomanded laser to use on a solo prospector?

and what would be the recomanded on a mole?
The Lancet seems like a good one on moles.
Thats something we'll have to figure out together soon. See below.
3.8 PTU Mining TEST - Sunday Dec 15st 3:00pm EST / 8:00pm UTC[
Location: Hurston No forum post for this, just be there if you can. Want 5-6 at least./QUOTE]
 

Den Kartho

Space Marshal
Dec 24, 2016
7
21
1,675
RSI Handle
Den_Kartho
I'd give skilled miners the helix, and then Hofstede or Lancets to new miners or those who are only going to help on the tough rocks.

The throttle dampening on the helix should be able to be mitigated in emergencies by backing off or swinging the gimbal off target, yes? So I guess what really matters on that one is just how hard the rock breaks even on a perfect fracture.

Also, I'm assuming only the user of the laser sees the debuff applied to the rock? If the lancet lowers instability and resistance for everyone mining the same rock, then I'd definitely want one guy with one of those on my team.
 

Black Sunder

Rock Raiders
Officer
Jun 19, 2014
8,270
26,834
3,045
RSI Handle
Black_Sunder
Also, I'm assuming only the user of the laser sees the debuff applied to the rock? If the lancet lowers instability and resistance for everyone mining the same rock, then I'd definitely want one guy with one of those on my team.
I assume the buffs/nerfs are unseen to everyone and will require head math and 'feeling' the rock out. Will find out tomorrow.
 

Paul

Space Marshal
May 9, 2015
7
9
1,675
RSI Handle
Necro_Infernus
Mentioned in Discord, but only suggestion would be adding the head price once it's live and not changing :) Even without that, it looks amazing! You guys rock <3

Assuming they are still not so expensive as to be running at a loss, I'd imagine using Helix's all around... but I also mine with an analogue control lever so fine heat control hasn't been an issue for me personally. Might be different if using a scroll wheel :)
 

Black Sunder

Rock Raiders
Officer
Jun 19, 2014
8,270
26,834
3,045
RSI Handle
Black_Sunder
Mentioned in Discord, but only suggestion would be adding the head price once it's live and not changing :) Even without that, it looks amazing! You guys rock <3

Assuming they are still not so expensive as to be running at a loss, I'd imagine using Helix's all around... but I also mine with an analogue control lever so fine heat control hasn't been an issue for me personally. Might be different if using a scroll wheel :)
Good idea on pricing and easy to add for later however these prices will probably fluctuate when the econ sim gets added.
 

Thalstan

Space Marshal
Jun 5, 2016
2,088
7,421
2,850
RSI Handle
Thalstan
The table is a bit confusing as to what is what, especially with the various positive and negative numbers and damping vs regular numbers, etc. I would suggest changing it all to a multiplier number for resistance and instability

So if it reduces either resistance or instability by half, the multiplier is 0.5
If it increases resistance or instability by half, the multiplier is 1.5

I think that would make it more readable. Maybe something like this?
Size 1 Mining Heads
NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge Window SizeResistance multiplierInstability multiplierPower TransferOptimal Charge RateCatastrophic Charge RateAll Charge RatesThrottle Respons-iveness DelayShatter DamageExtraction ThroughputConsumable Slots
Lancet MH130m150m
0.50​
0.70​
1200​
-30%​
0.45 SCU/s
3​
Arbor MH130m150m
1.00​
1400​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Hofstede-S1 15m75m
0.50​
2000​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Klein-S1 30m150m
0.90​
1.50​
2500​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Impact I 30m150m
1.20​
3000​
20%​
100%​
50%​
0.45 SCU/s
1​
Helix I37.5m187.5m
30%​
0.80​
0.50​
3000​
30%​
-50%​
150%​
0.50 SCU/s
3​


Size 2 Mining Heads
NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge Window SizeResistance multiplierInstability multiplierPower TransferOptimal Charge RateCatastrophic Charge RateAll Charge RatesThrottle Respons-iveness DelayShatter DamageExtraction ThroughputConsumable Slots
Lancet MH260m300m
0.50​
0.70​
1200​
-30%​
0.45 SCU/s
3​
Arbor MH260m300m
1.00​
1400​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Hofstede-S2 45m225m
0.50​
2000​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Klein-S260m300m
0.90​
1.50​
2500​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Impact II60m300m
1.20​
3000​
20%​
100%​
50%​
0.45 SCU/s
1​
Helix II75m375m
30%​
0.80​
0.50​
3000​
30%​
-50%​
150%​
0.50 SCU/s
3​
 

Black Sunder

Rock Raiders
Officer
Jun 19, 2014
8,270
26,834
3,045
RSI Handle
Black_Sunder
The table is a bit confusing as to what is what, especially with the various positive and negative numbers and damping vs regular numbers, etc. I would suggest changing it all to a multiplier number for resistance and instability

So if it reduces either resistance or instability by half, the multiplier is 0.5
If it increases resistance or instability by half, the multiplier is 1.5

I think that would make it more readable. Maybe something like this?
Size 1 Mining Heads
NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge Window SizeResistance multiplierInstability multiplierPower TransferOptimal Charge RateCatastrophic Charge RateAll Charge RatesThrottle Respons-iveness DelayShatter DamageExtraction ThroughputConsumable Slots
Lancet MH130m150m
0.50​
0.70​
1200​
-30%​
0.45 SCU/s
3​
Arbor MH130m150m
1.00​
1400​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Hofstede-S115m75m
0.50​
2000​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Klein-S130m150m
0.90​
1.50​
2500​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Impact I30m150m
1.20​
3000​
20%​
100%​
50%​
0.45 SCU/s
1​
Helix I37.5m187.5m
30%​
0.80​
0.50​
3000​
30%​
-50%​
150%​
0.50 SCU/s
3​


Size 2 Mining Heads
NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge Window SizeResistance multiplierInstability multiplierPower TransferOptimal Charge RateCatastrophic Charge RateAll Charge RatesThrottle Respons-iveness DelayShatter DamageExtraction ThroughputConsumable Slots
Lancet MH260m300m
0.50​
0.70​
1200​
-30%​
0.45 SCU/s
3​
Arbor MH260m300m
1.00​
1400​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Hofstede-S245m225m
0.50​
2000​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Klein-S260m300m
0.90​
1.50​
2500​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Impact II60m300m
1.20​
3000​
20%​
100%​
50%​
0.45 SCU/s
1​
Helix II75m375m
30%​
0.80​
0.50​
3000​
30%​
-50%​
150%​
0.50 SCU/s
3​
We'll see. We're trying to stay consistent to what is displayed ingame.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Vavrik

Vavrik

Space Marshal
Donor
Sep 19, 2017
5,476
21,988
3,025
RSI Handle
Vavrik
The table is a bit confusing as to what is what, especially with the various positive and negative numbers and damping vs regular numbers, etc. I would suggest changing it all to a multiplier number for resistance and instability

So if it reduces either resistance or instability by half, the multiplier is 0.5
If it increases resistance or instability by half, the multiplier is 1.5

I think that would make it more readable. Maybe something like this?
Size 1 Mining Heads
NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge Window SizeResistance multiplierInstability multiplierPower TransferOptimal Charge RateCatastrophic Charge RateAll Charge RatesThrottle Respons-iveness DelayShatter DamageExtraction ThroughputConsumable Slots
Lancet MH130m150m
0.50​
0.70​
1200​
-30%​
0.45 SCU/s
3​
Arbor MH130m150m
1.00​
1400​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Hofstede-S115m75m
0.50​
2000​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Klein-S130m150m
0.90​
1.50​
2500​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Impact I30m150m
1.20​
3000​
20%​
100%​
50%​
0.45 SCU/s
1​
Helix I37.5m187.5m
30%​
0.80​
0.50​
3000​
30%​
-50%​
150%​
0.50 SCU/s
3​


Size 2 Mining Heads
NameOptimal RangeMaximum RangeOptimal Charge Window SizeResistance multiplierInstability multiplierPower TransferOptimal Charge RateCatastrophic Charge RateAll Charge RatesThrottle Respons-iveness DelayShatter DamageExtraction ThroughputConsumable Slots
Lancet MH260m300m
0.50​
0.70​
1200​
-30%​
0.45 SCU/s
3​
Arbor MH260m300m
1.00​
1400​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Hofstede-S245m225m
0.50​
2000​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Klein-S260m300m
0.90​
1.50​
2500​
0.35 SCU/s
0​
Impact II60m300m
1.20​
3000​
20%​
100%​
50%​
0.45 SCU/s
1​
Helix II75m375m
30%​
0.80​
0.50​
3000​
30%​
-50%​
150%​
0.50 SCU/s
3​
I like this. A lot! Maybe not in the guide itself but it's a good reference for when people get comfortable and start thinking about different equipment.
 

Thalstan

Space Marshal
Jun 5, 2016
2,088
7,421
2,850
RSI Handle
Thalstan
Mole mining suggestions.

I've now used a helix on my prospector on some big rocks (5k ish/10 percent bexalite/5 percent Hepnaestanite/20 percent quartz was the biggest).
Instability on this puppy was high at around 5.5 or so raw, about 2.75 with the helix

Now, given that instability was my biggest factor in this, and in the interest of keeping things as inexpensive as possible, I would recommend the following loadout on a MOLE, assuming you mine with a crew of 2-3 miners

Front installation - Helix S2
both side installations with the Hofstede S2,
This would put your total costs in the range of 130k or so for mining heads compared to 330k (ish) for 3 Helix lasers)

Yes, it would be really nice to have 3 Helix as it increases the number of rocks you can mine at once (once they fix the UI). Since the helix can crack anything at present, the other two would just be there for the buffs to green window size, instability, and resistance (just resistance if you have the hofstedes). Just get in range for the Hofstedes (or 3 Helix) for the rock you are going to crack, and have two people just target the rock and keep it on minimum power and let your best miner control the cracking of the rocks. Once all the rocks have been cracked, sweep up the good stuff and move on.

Even with an initial instability of 6, having just one Hofstede and one Helix will reduce that to 1.5, which is very manageable. Another Hofstede would reduce it to .75 (if I am doing the math right), which would make it downright easy to crack.

Now, you can run with 3 Hofstede units too, putting your upgrade investment at 30-33k or so, which is significantly cheaper than just one Helix, and I would suggest that you might want to procure your two side units first as even with just those two, you should be able to crack any rock you come across, but it might take more coordination work for the initial crack.

So, all that said, if you do mining with crews, I would run the following path for upgrades
Hofstede, Hofstede, Helix, then maybe add one or two more helix for your sides. Just beware. If you use 3 helix, it's going to REALLY HURT if you blow that rock up by accident.
 

Black Sunder

Rock Raiders
Officer
Jun 19, 2014
8,270
26,834
3,045
RSI Handle
Black_Sunder
Mole mining suggestions.

I've now used a helix on my prospector on some big rocks (5k ish/10 percent bexalite/5 percent Hepnaestanite/20 percent quartz was the biggest).
Instability on this puppy was high at around 5.5 or so raw, about 2.75 with the helix

Now, given that instability was my biggest factor in this, and in the interest of keeping things as inexpensive as possible, I would recommend the following loadout on a MOLE, assuming you mine with a crew of 2-3 miners

Front installation - Helix S2
both side installations with the Hofstede S2,
This would put your total costs in the range of 130k or so for mining heads compared to 330k (ish) for 3 Helix lasers)

Yes, it would be really nice to have 3 Helix as it increases the number of rocks you can mine at once (once they fix the UI). Since the helix can crack anything at present, the other two would just be there for the buffs to green window size, instability, and resistance (just resistance if you have the hofstedes). Just get in range for the Hofstedes (or 3 Helix) for the rock you are going to crack, and have two people just target the rock and keep it on minimum power and let your best miner control the cracking of the rocks. Once all the rocks have been cracked, sweep up the good stuff and move on.

Even with an initial instability of 6, having just one Hofstede and one Helix will reduce that to 1.5, which is very manageable. Another Hofstede would reduce it to .75 (if I am doing the math right), which would make it downright easy to crack.

Now, you can run with 3 Hofstede units too, putting your upgrade investment at 30-33k or so, which is significantly cheaper than just one Helix, and I would suggest that you might want to procure your two side units first as even with just those two, you should be able to crack any rock you come across, but it might take more coordination work for the initial crack.

So, all that said, if you do mining with crews, I would run the following path for upgrades
Hofstede, Hofstede, Helix, then maybe add one or two more helix for your sides. Just beware. If you use 3 helix, it's going to REALLY HURT if you blow that rock up by accident.
You're got the math correct.

I have encountered rocks(very rare) that could not be cracked by a Helix. These usually have 4-5 different minerals inside of them and while the rock may have only been a 6K mass or so rock with 'low' resistance it still took 2 full power helix heads to break it. Why? I don't have any proof but I suspect that each mineral inside the rock has a specific resistance factor to it. Combined with the overall mass of the rock the laser sometimes won't make a dent unless you bring a 2nd.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Vavrik

BUTUZ

Space Marshal
Donor
Apr 8, 2016
3,602
12,199
2,850
RSI Handle
BUTUZ
All this mining talk almost makes me want to buy my prospector back!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vavrik
Forgot your password?