The Redeemer is unique in design, but not functionally.
I.
Not my proudest f.... wait a momentOh god, why?
Here you go:
The exact reason that LTI is necessary for larger ships.Additionally, we're probably looking at LTI for it - Idk about you guys, but an asset that size that we don't have to worry about loosing in combat is going to give us an insane edge if push comes to shove and we need bait / a rear guard / to ram any moons..
Test mascot is Best mascot.If i ever happen to visit you, i higlhy recomend you to check my bags when I'm leaving, you may loose your dog if you don't.
Cuteness overload Kleptomania is triggered.
d) CakeIt's bigger and more expensive, therefore we MUST HAVE IT.
But seriously, while I think it would be better to have a Polaris than a Redeemer,
a) we will probably have fucktons of people that melt off smaller ships (Redeemer, Reclaimer, BMM, Orion, etc etc)
b) let's wait to see if its a good price:performance ratio
c) it's also going to be "babies first capital ship" so most likely it's attainable for a single person, or more easily an individual squad.
crud, I already voted to melt it.If one single person votes for keeping the Redeemer, I'll post a picture of my dog naked as retribution.
Yes.Bunch of yes men, all of you!