Test Squadron Organisation & Subdivisions
- Thread starter I_MIKE_I
- Start date
I just thought this thread needed some class, ya know? Hahaha.
Also, you're welcome!
THIS IS THE ONLY OTHER NECESSARY SUBDIVISION!
Test Squadron Red Shirts
Test Squadron Red Shirts
Last edited:
THIS IS THE ONLY OTHER NECESSARY SUBDIVISION!
Test Squadron Red Shirts
SIGN ME UP!!!!!
Go dig a 6 foot hole up that hill, I explain later.
Well, actualy he does, but the Death is a huge Fan, and refuses to tell him...
That is actually the only thing I suggested... the other parts are just to make it work smoothly.
I think I did a bad job explaining it properly, so I a picture which hopefully makes it easier to understand:
To point it out again: It would allow players to join (sub)-Division for every aspect of the Game and switch to the fitting command-structure on the fly.
For example, player X would want to do escort missions, cargo hauling, mining and racing, so he'd be in subdivisions for escorting, cargo hauling, mining and racing. Depending on what he feels like doing, all he has to do is switching channels and he'd immediately be in the appropriate place of the command structure AND the leader of said subdivision would not even have to ask what the Player would like to do or have people saying they'd rather do something else.
Attachments
At least the part with the smaller subdivisions does look quite different... also our subdivisions are currently not divided by purpose, which means it's more complicated to actually lead them.
Its too early to start slicing up the pie.
We will get there when the game has the actual gameplay mechanics in it.
We do not want to start creating divisions that look like Combat > Combat scouting > scouting support > support fueling > fueling security and so on. Its just way too early for that.
That's not what I did mean to imply with smaller subdivisions.
The Subdivisions in my suggestions would merely be shown as another branch in a command structure inside the same division.
You can think of it as sort of a naval chain of command:
You'd be the President,
the Co-Leaders would be like Vice-Predsidents,
the Division Leaders would be Admirals,
the Subdivision Leaders would be Captains
and the Subdivision-Members would be your typical Ensign etc.
Or in other words, it's logical that 1 Person Commanding 50-100 People is more efficient in doing so than 10 People Commanding 500-1000 People trough the same channel.