Theorycraft - Starfarer MOAB delivery system.

NaffNaffBobFace

NaffNaffBobFace

Space Marshal
Donor
Jan 5, 2016
12,237
44,990
3,150
RSI Handle
NaffNaffBobFace
The gas tanks on the Starfarer are big. I mean really big. I mean potential Mother Of All Bombs delivery system big.

Now MOABs are a thing with the Crusader Hercules concept, I look at the the picture of the moab and the Starfarers gas tanks, and I wonder to myself... I see 6 removable tanks and 2 fixed ones. Those six tanks... You could pull them out and mount 6 MOABs in there - maybe even more depending on the bombs eventual size... The ship wouldn't be a fighter but it'd be one monster of a bomber...

What do we think? Plan?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Vindictive69, Tealwraith, Blind Owl and 8 others
Vavrik

Vavrik

Space Marshal
Donor
Sep 19, 2017
5,476
21,988
3,025
RSI Handle
Vavrik
You also have all that cargo space in the back, with a nice ramp to roll things down. Going to depend on the mechanics whether or not you can do that. I'd like to think we have a little room for ship role improvisation, So plan, maybe?

Problem is of course, theorycrafting is really just wishful thinking at this stage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tealwraith, Blind Owl, Talonsbane and 4 others
NaffNaffBobFace

NaffNaffBobFace

Space Marshal
Donor
Jan 5, 2016
12,237
44,990
3,150
RSI Handle
NaffNaffBobFace
Vavrik said:
Problem is of course, theorycrafting is really just wishful thinking at this stage.
Click to expand...
Ah, the best kind of thinking in a Pre-Alpha. Gives the Devs ideas. Good point on the cargo bay, you'd get one or two in there too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tealwraith, Blind Owl, Talonsbane and 3 others
NaffNaffBobFace

NaffNaffBobFace

Space Marshal
Donor
Jan 5, 2016
12,237
44,990
3,150
RSI Handle
NaffNaffBobFace
Printimus said:
Probably will never happen as the starfarer's primary mission is fueling.
Click to expand...
An Auroras primary mission is not blocking out the sun, but still we will prevail :)

I get what you mean, they gotta lock in some constraints somewhere - but when I saw that big ol' bomb and those external tanks I was like "It just makes sense".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blind Owl, Talonsbane, Bambooza and 3 others
Jolly_Green_Giant

Jolly_Green_Giant

Space Marshal
Donor
Jun 25, 2016
1,310
4,610
2,650
RSI Handle
Jolly_Green_Giant
Can we just load up a Hull-E with MOABS for fleet combat, escort it to the center of the battle space, get it rolling really fast and release them all? OR... how about just getting relatively close in low orbit over a target with the Hull-E and just letting them loose and gravity doing the rest? HOW ABOUT.... Kamakaze Hull-E's? How about a fleet of them.


Now I hope mines are a thing. You can't get into a planet without crossing a barrier of mines (kinda like ship mines in the water, but in space. Space mines). We need a mine layer.


CIG plz.


I like theorycrafting ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radegast74, Blind Owl, Talonsbane and 3 others
sum1

sum1

Space Marshal
Jun 26, 2015
1,007
3,039
2,600
RSI Handle
sum1
As much as this is a cool idea, I am much more a fan of sitting from space and launching 4 size 10 Kinetic bombardment devices (KBD) from my Polaris. Where a modern MOAB has a blast yield of "11 tons TNT" were as KBD "In the case of the system mentioned in the 2003 Air Force report above, a 6.1 m × 0.3 m tungsten cylinder impacting at Mach 10 has a kinetic energy equivalent to approximately 11.5 tons of TNT (or 7.2 tons of dynamite)." the airforce determined it was not worth the price because of the cost to get the weapon into space, but if you are already in space...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-43/B_MOAB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Edit: oh and close support? I think a Hammer Head will be better, in part because of it's weapon placements are so well designed, 5/6 weapons will be able to fire if it's movie parallel to the ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radegast74, Blind Owl, Shadow Reaper and 4 others
Cool-Hand-Luke

Cool-Hand-Luke

Space Marshal
Jan 3, 2016
366
1,482
1,950
RSI Handle
Cool-Hand-Luke
sum1 said:
As much as this is a cool idea, I am much more a fan of sitting from space and launching 4 size 10 Kinetic bombardment devices (KBD) from my Polaris. Where a modern MOAB has a blast yield of "11 tons TNT" were as KBD "In the case of the system mentioned in the 2003 Air Force report above, a 6.1 m × 0.3 m tungsten cylinder impacting at Mach 10 has a kinetic energy equivalent to approximately 11.5 tons of TNT (or 7.2 tons of dynamite)." the airforce determined it was not worth the price because of the cost to get the weapon into space, but if you are already in space...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-43/B_MOAB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Edit: oh and close support? I think a Hammer Head will be better, in part because of it's weapon placements are so well designed, 5/6 weapons will be able to fire if it's movie parallel to the ground.
Click to expand...
When I first saw the downward view cockpit on the hammer I thought that ship was specifically designed for air to ground...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blind Owl, NaffNaffBobFace, Talonsbane and 3 others
sum1

sum1

Space Marshal
Jun 26, 2015
1,007
3,039
2,600
RSI Handle
sum1
Cool-Hand-Luke said:
When I first saw the downward view cockpit on the hammer I thought that ship was specifically designed for air to ground...
Click to expand...
I think it will be amazing for Air-to-Ground support, as well as any patrol mission. or any time it has to fight under its weight class.

Also what I see in my mind every time I talk about the Hammerhead...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blind Owl, NaffNaffBobFace, Talonsbane and 2 others
Printimus

Printimus

Space Marshal
Officer
Donor
Dec 22, 2015
10,674
39,041
3,160
RSI Handle
Printimus
NaffNaffBobFace said:
An Auroras primary mission is not blocking out the sun, but still we will prevail :slight_smile:

I get what you mean, they gotta lock in some constraints somewhere - but when I saw that big ol' bomb and those external tanks I was like "It just makes sense".
Click to expand...
looks good on paper, terrible idea when implemented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blind Owl, NaffNaffBobFace, Bambooza and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Forgot your password?