ShakyWater
Vice Admiral
European governments throw people in jail every damn day for hate speech online. Pretending they are just now crossing the line into 1984 is silly.
All it takes is one. Its why tree's are so tall, its why people stand right next to the baggage carousel instead of stepping back. In fact there is an extensive study in game theory on why. While it is in our best interest for everyone to not pay for priority service, it will happen due to the fact that those who jump in first will gain a significant leg up on everyone else and those who do not pay will quickly be left behind.If zero people/companies pay for priority packet, the traffic would essentially stay the same as it is now....?
Interesting point.All it takes is one. Its why tree's are so tall, its why people stand right next to the baggage carousel instead of stepping back. In fact there is an extensive study in game theory on why. While it is in our best interest for everyone to not pay for priority service, it will happen due to the fact that those who jump in first will gain a significant leg up on everyone else and those who do not pay will quickly be left behind.
You’re equating someone being punished for parking illegally with commercial interests throttling what’s very reasonably considered an essential service so they can obtain more profit?If the removal of nutrality decision has been driven by the 'free market' then do as the free market tells you, and don't pay for something you don't want.
If zero people/companies pay for priority packet, the traffic would essentially stay the same as it is now....?
Use the free market the way it's supposed to be used. Make Pai pay - if he is the only person in the country willing to pay for it the Free Market will make his bills a million dollars a month due to supply, demand and having to cover the costs of running the system in the first place.
Look at the French. When wheel clamps came to France, they as a people reacted all in the same way: Whenever a Frenchman saw a clamped vehicle, they jammed the lock with Super Glue - the clamping devices has to be distroyed to free the car once the fine had been paid which cost time and resources and the clamp companies went bust. I don't know if thats an urban legend but it's online, I'd love Snopes to look into that one.
If clampers want to clamp cars in France, they can - and they'll stay clamped. But if ISPs want to slow down your connection, they can. But you and every other captive customer can then spam review sites saying the service is slow. When their Net Premotor Score hit single figures, they'll have to act or distroy their businesses with shareholder revolts.
Nope. I'm highlighting what can be done with a common reaction to a situation. :slight_smile:You’re equating someone being punished for parking illegally with commercial interests throttling what’s very reasonably considered an essential service so they can obtain more profit?
European governments throw people in jail every damn day for hate speech online. Pretending they are just now crossing the line into 1984 is silly.
As do I.This is going to be a huge legal issue, and I foresee this going to the supreme court.
not really sure what this has to do with net neutrality...British Police Arrest Nine People a Day for Posting Offensive Messages Online
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/british-arrest-offensive-messages/
but i bet the police have fun doing it, eh?not really sure what this has to do with net neutrality...
From that article:
Pai said:California's bill prohibits ISPs from blocking or slowing down websites or "whole classes of applications," like video. It also specifically prohibits ISPs from charging online services access fees to reach customers, a practice known as paid prioritization.
Those same consumer protections were part of the federal net neutrality rules that the FCC scrapped. However, California's rules takes things a step further by also disallowing ISPs from not counting certain content and websites they own against subscribers' data caps, a practice known as "zero-rating."
Pai's comments can be viewed as him wanting to get ahead of the situation, and perhaps put pressure on Governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, to not sign the bill.
My corrections:"Let me be clear: The Internet should be run by engineers, entrepreneurs, and technologists, not lawyers, bureaucrats, and politicians. That’s what we decided in 2017, and we’re going to fight to make sure it stays that way," Pai added.
That's essentially what Pai is saying.... the fuckin turd.From that article:
Pai said:
My corrections:
"Let me be clear: The Internet should be run byengineers, entrepreneurs, and technologists, notlobbyists, lawyers, telecom bureaucrats, and politicians under the influence of cable companies. That’s whatweme and my donors/overslords decided in 2017, and we’re going to fight to make sure it stays that way," Pai added.
Probably.... handcuffs and all...but i bet the police have fun doing it, eh?
I'll put my money on the Entrepreneurs. Bill McGowan with MCI took AT&T and Baby Bells to the woodshed in the late 80s and early 90s. People will vote with their pocketbooks as innovation will always find a way to beat the companies relying on politicians to protect their bottom lines.Spirited debate and if necessary, legal protests are much more effective, as is voting in local, state, and federal elections.