http://www.pcinvasion.com/star-citizen-backer-earns-3k-refund-contacting-us-district-attorney
View: http://imgur.com/IIwd8sZ
The User named "Streetroller" claimed his right for repayment, based on the former terms of service by CIG wherein a release was stated latest around May 2016.
The good thing I may see is that CIG possibly now speeds up things a little bit. That said, I am absolutely unsympathetic to this "Streetroller" for not avouching to his invest but instead playing chicken. Shame on him.
View: http://imgur.com/IIwd8sZ
The User named "Streetroller" claimed his right for repayment, based on the former terms of service by CIG wherein a release was stated latest around May 2016.
That makes me a little bit sad and I definetly hope that this won't become "the thing" trying to get the money back. This could ruin the whole backing/kickstarter philosophy and - perhaps - threaten the whole idea of the Star Citizen universe. Finally, there only will remain one group of winners, and that will be the lawyers.While that particular passage has been in the ToS since the beginning, Streetroller cites a different passage which potentially contradicts it. The passage Streetroller quotes was altered by CIG back in June. Streetroller says he never agreed to these ‘updated’ ToS. (...) The story doesn’t quite end there, because on 11 July (one day before his PayPal refunds show up) Streetroller was contacted by an investigator from the LA Department of Consumer and Business Affairs. After an hour long discussion about Star Citizen, Streetroller says he was told to encourage others to file complaints against CIG with the DCBA.
The good thing I may see is that CIG possibly now speeds up things a little bit. That said, I am absolutely unsympathetic to this "Streetroller" for not avouching to his invest but instead playing chicken. Shame on him.