I'm pleased the EVO's are sticking to their promise not to leak stuff. That was the deal, its a matter of trust and integrity. :thumbsup:
Good question, I dunno but from the two patch updates I've been with the game (2.5 to 2.6 and 2.6 to 3.0) it seems to be a running theme. 2.5 flat out died when 2.6 went to Test Universe.How does Evo have an impact on public servers? Doesn't CIG use dedicated servers for Evo?
It won't have any impact on the public servers as they are not on the public servers. Since CIG is using Lumberyard, that would imply that they have the ability to use AWS if they are not using their own servers, or their own servers get full.How does Evo have an impact on public servers? Doesn't CIG use dedicated servers for Evo?
AWS right, so they just rebalance their available servercapacity between the non public test instances and the public test instances, I assume.It won't have any impact on the public servers as they are not on the public servers. Since CIG is using Lumberyard, that would imply that they have the ability to use AWS if they are not using their own servers, or their own servers get full.
Remember when the Evocati are on 3.0 they are not on the public servers so their traffic would be missing from the public servers. :slight_smile:
I think so as well .. what worth mentioning though is that "public test instance" is called PTU .. and all "secret" testing resources are taken from that pool as well ( it would be quite painful to manage all data points reconnection for public test pool due to each secret testing wave :) )AWS right, so they just rebalance their available servercapacity between the non public test instances and the public test instances, I assume.
AWS can be done on demand.AWS right, so they just rebalance their available servercapacity between the non public test instances and the public test instances, I assume.
Thats what we do at work, if we open a new application on our test machines to all internal users. The development machine gets less resources, the test machine more. I don't think, CIG will pay for unlimited AWS resources for test instances. So Evocati gets more, playground (2.6) gets less. And that is, how it should be to get Evocati done.
P.S.: We don't use AWS, but we host our servers on an esx-cluster.
I'm not an Avocado, but I can tell you that 3.0 has features and fidelity.
Woaaaah harsh dude.As someone that used to run software QA for a 3D software company, I used to bounce members of our equivalent team for even hinting they were on the team.
Only if you two agree on a safe word or hand signal otherwise what could be an enjoyable moment of trust and submission is just strangulation.Can I hold someone else's breath?
Public Test Universe https://robertsspaceindustries.com/faq/faq-ptuBtw, what is this PTU and how do one get an invitation to that?
Completely wasting their time. 3.0 is the new hotness. Report bugs there or don't report them at all.Are the 2.6 bugs going to be addressed now that 3.0 is nearly here, or are those poor souls over at the issue council wasting their time? lol
For using the PTU you'd have to prove you are there to Test the game and its bugs rather than just play and mess about. The people who provide and use the most content to the highest quality in the Issue Council are the ones who'd get access to the PTU, so you'd need to do 3 things.Btw, what is this PTU and how do one get an invitation to that?
I'm not totally sure about that but on famous platform, where people discuss many things, there is an "evocati invitation leak", with what avocados should focus in this first testing step.It's my impression that what the avocados are playing right now isn't the actual 3.0. Rather, this is merely a portion of what they are planning in 3.0. If i remember correctly, they scaled down what they were initially releasing to the test group and will continue to piece it out to them until the evocatti are testing the full 3.0 build. Then, after that's tested enough, it will go to the PTU.
It's my understanding that they basically only have the planets right now instead of the full list of planned 3.0 features. If that's the case, we have a very long way to go before we can even get an initial impression of how fun 3.0 is. I could be wrong though.