Now that is interesting, Glorious Leader - I was looking at the UK deaths over average graph and can see the first wave with it's vast mountain of deaths all at once, then nothing for a bit, and the second wave now building:
View attachment 19507
My question for anyone saying those who died were likely those with existing health issues and the elderly who "were going to die soon anyway" is:
Where is the valley compared to that mountain from the first wave to offset it? If they were going to die later in the year, exactly where in the above graph is the bit where all those deaths that happened early didn't happen later? It's 73,000 excess deaths and counting in the UK... If it were indeed the case that it was mainly people who were going to die soon, should the above graph not look like the below, where those early deaths are accounted for:
View attachment 19508
Because 2020 hardly had any dip below the expected 5 year average. I'd like to ask those who believe the victims "would have died soon anyway", when "soon?" is meant to be? By the looks of the graph for those who died early in April to May, "soon" wasn't in 2020... So, next year maybe? If it's the year after that, that's getting on to be the last three years taken off someones life... Three years is a lot of living, that's too long to be considered "soon" anymore, isn't it...? Is five years still considered "soon"? Ten perhaps? And how many years robbed off the end of tens of thousands of lives is considered too many to no longer be able to justify protesting and refusing mandatory masks or a month long Lockdown to get cases under control?