Here is the original report from the New England Journal of Medicine:I am not sure social distancing, masks, or quarantines work - I am not 100% sold. Reason is, even isolated people get the virus. How could an isolated instance still produce positive results - could it be the tests are defective, could it be another reason.
A study conducted by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in cooperation with the Naval Medical Research Center sought to test lockdowns along with testing and isolation.
The Marines did not go anywhere, bleached the mess hall, cleaned their dorm rooms. As a former soldier, I know basic trainees never leave the program once entered. So, as much as I hate using our Marines as test subjects, this is better than an untested vaccine, this is a good example of a isolated population in a controlled environment.
In May, 3,143 new recruits to the Marines were given the option to participate in a study of frequent testing under extreme quarantine. The study was called CHARM, which stands for COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines. Of the recruits asked, a total of 1,848 young people agreed to be guinea pigs in this experiment which involved “which included weekly qPCR testing and blood sampling for IgG antibody assessment.” In addition, the CHARM study volunteers who did test positively “on the day of enrollment (day 0) or on day 7 or day 14 were separated from their roommates and were placed in isolation.”
View attachment 19275
The lockdowners keep telling us to pay attention to the science. That’s what we are doing. When the results contradict their pro-compulsion narrative, they pretend that the studies do not exist and barrel ahead with their scary plans to disable all social functioning in the presence of a virus. Lockdowns are not science. They never have been. They are an experiment in social/political top-down management that is without precedent in cost to life and liberty.
You can read the study at
"The lockdowners keep telling us to pay attention to the science. That’s what we are doing. When the results contradict their pro-compulsion narrative, they pretend that the studies do not exist and barrel ahead with their scary plans to disable all social functioning in the presence of a virus...www.aier.org
Your original article is reading it through someone else's filter - Please read the original - I'm not even going to tell your my interpretation of it, you don't need my filter on it too.
Now you have read the original report and its actual conclusions - what are your conclusions?