Radegast74
Space Marshal
No, it's not too early. It's like having an airplane lose a wing in flight...would you say it would be too early to make a judgment about it crashing? and to wait until 2023? LOL ... you can make an accurate prediction that the plane without a wing will crash, because we know there are physical laws governing flight, and we know what happens when a human body hits the ground at a certain speed, etc.Its still way to early to make such judgments on Sweden's policy.
In a similar manner, the virus spreads according to certain known parameters, even if it is a "novel" coronavirus...we know in general how virus spread and we know how other coronaviruses spread. We also know the medical impact of the virus. Think of the old Donald Rumsfeld "known knowns and known unknowns..."
What is going to happen is, the higher the number of people infected, the more infections you will get on subsequent days/weeks/months, as people interact with each other and enable the spread, *unless active steps* are taken to reduce the opportunities for the virus to spread. The more infections, the more likely people will need a higher level of care, and at a certain point the hospitals will be swamped and unable to provide the care needed for the worst cases, which will lead to a higher number of deaths/higher death rate.
Google for yourself the relative impact of COVID in the countries surrounding Sweden. And while you are at it, look at the stats of recent cases in countries like Australia and New Zealand, where they took active steps early to halt the spread. Or, wait until 2023, I don't care, but sticking your head in the sand and ignoring reality/science isn't the way to make decisions and policy for large groups of people, like counties/states/nations. Well, it isn't the optimum way to make policy or decisions, even if certain leaders/presidents/douchebags are making their decisions this way. So, exercise some personal responsibility!