Radegast74
Space Marshal
The issue is that there were enough beds *before* the crisis (and it is a CRISIS) to treat this person; now with COVID all the beds were full.I would be careful of these stories.
If you read the story, you would have seen that it is normal for them to transfer the patient to another facility, and that in this case, previously it would have been routine and fairly quick.
However, now, it was anything but routine. This is similar to the story before about the other 40-something year old you died of the gallbladder problem...the physician there even said in his entire career he had never lost a patient with that diagnosis before.
EDIT: I don't want to go down a rabbit hole, but before anybody starts blaming Obamacare for anything, one of the reasons why smaller hospitals don't do some complicated procedures in because of the "the more you do, the better you get at it" competency rule...you just have better outcomes when you do procedures more often. It is now quite common for smaller hospitals to diagnose and stabilize somebody and then send them to a bigger regoinal medical center for the so-called complicated procedure. Here is the first PubMed hit showing that low-volume hospital programs led to excess mortality:
Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York - PubMed
Excess coronary artery bypass grafting mortality in California is related to the large number of low-volume programs. Excess percutaneous coronary intervention mortality might be related to case selection or timing of intervention. A relationship between percutaneous coronary intervention volume...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Last edited: