Not to ask a personal question, but which county/state is this? It would be interesting to log the transmission rate if I can find one. Please feel free to refuse to answer, I don't want you to be giving out personal details on the internets if you aren't comfortable with that.
If one lawyer can infect 37 people it seems the transmission rate is 100% (assume each one of those 37 people infects another 37 people and you've got wildfire going on), as in if you come into contact with it, it will set up shop in your cells unchallenged. With a current mortality rate of 3.4% and a rough total population of 330,500,000 we are looking at 11,237,000 total fatalities if 100% of the population comes in to contact with the contagion.
This will of course very dependent on what the actual mortality rate is and a countries population balance of vulnerable persons. In the UK it has been observed people of BAME (black, asian and minority ethnic) backgrounds are twice as at risk of death from the pathogen, the elderly, and persons with underlying medical complications also have a higher risk of death.
The above complications of course assume a 100% exposure rate, all have varying causes and complications which may not transplant directly from one countries expiriance to another, such as lifestyle etc, and there are unknowns that may also have negative or positives so the actual risk is going to vary wildly, so lets put tolerance of 10% on that 11 million number - So a rough estimate is somewhere between 10,113,300 and 12,360,700.
To put this in context, the latest data I can find for a yearly death toll in the US was 2017, at 2.8 million.
This article looks at the leading causes of death in the United States, including heart disease, cancer, and the impact of COVID-19.
www.medicalnewstoday.com
I looked up the death rate from the 1930's Great Depression, and was surprised to find the mortality rate from the data they were able to source revealed it actually remained fairly steady rather than rose:
"Our study provides evidence that even major depressions do not imply mortality crises," says study lead author David Stuckler, of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. "Whether health improves or worsens during hard times depends mainly on how governments choose to respond."
www.smithsonianmag.com
So we now have a base level for how many an economic depression could kill (I'm not saying it's zero, because it is not) it's a question of which is more lethal: A depression which protects a lot of people from the pathogen but effects their lifestyle/livelihood (without government support to maintain it) or a pathogen with a 100% transmission rate and a mortality rate of 3.4%...
Interesting times, the die is cast. We can only sit back and see what happens now.