No one is challenging prices. I'm challenging his conduct. The man acted in poor judgement to ban me from the Discord
Is this guy serious?
MY CONDUCT? I ended the conversation by telling him to f off (for playing dumb semantic games and arguing and not stopping as I asked, more than once kindly.) and then I blocked him. That should have been the end of it. Then he takes parts of the PRIVATE conversation (not everything, he picked and choose out of the conversation what he wanted to share) and blasts it all across Discords and Reddit because he assumed I banned him when I didn't. He interfered with my post, and what looks like his alt, or at least a friend of his also interfered. Instead of just letting go and moving on, now he's coming onto our forum and my thread for TESTies (not him), still being obstinate and obnoxious and just pure obsessive (all could be acceptable for a TESTie if it were not malicious, but what he did in return and continued to do was malicious). A DECENT human being, the moment upon seeing I didn't intend for him to be banned, would have apologized for that crusading and deleted all the crusading crap he posted, and not continuing to instigate and escalate. A REAL apology would mean doing just that and not arguing with my ORG mates after coming in to post an "apology".
You know, a mod from Xplore, who I allowed on my business FB where I have celebrities I've worked with, he posted inappropriate things on my wall, I asked him not to do that (kindly) and deleted the posts. He then had the audacity to argue with me after I reminded him of the situation (required professionalism) and then the nut job banned me from the Xplore discord. I vented here with my fellow TESTies, and moved on. Xplore was a Zombie Org by that point anyway., not a big deal. His loss. People like that, don't make good leaders. Good leadership is REQUIRED to keep something as fragile as a video game player group together even if the game in question keeps player interest. TEST has stayed around as long as it has not because of it's size, it's because of it's leadership and ability to adapt to change. Where ever that change is (including in leadership). Someone with a Legatus fleet (assuming, for all I know this Theotokos guy could just be gray market and not have more than a few personal ships) is likely someone who would want a lot of TESTies to crew their ships. This means automatic leadership responsibilities. It is this Org's interest to protect itself from potentially bad leaders.. and not the good bad... the bad bad.. as in violating rule #1... DON'T BE A DOUCHE BAG. After everything I've seen this Theotokos guy do after the fact, the TEST mods were right to ban him. I was too lenient and I will learn from this mistake, going forward.
P.S. For contrasting clarity, I've had plenty of disagreements with other Legatus backers, NONE... and I mean NO ONE ELSE in that group, has gotten to the point where I was compelled to tell them to f off and block them. Even the ones that want to buy up my stuff to resell (which I vehemently dislike), at least don't give attitudes or instigate arguments when I don't do what they want. For the Legatus backers that DM'd me in support after what happened in this scenario, thank you, you know who you are, and I appreciate you. And also, Naff, Brict, Makute, Drowez, Vah, thank you very much for your support! it meant a lot to me reading your replies, thank you.