Yanno, my doctor doesn't recommend self diagnosis and self medication with doses of any medication administered for cattle or horses. Or fish, dogs and cats. But in the parts of the US, it seems to be a thing people just do anyway.
True, that. Don't want to leave myself in a position of unimpartiality, perhaps I should just copy/pate the headlines, no risk of filtering if I do that...? We'll try the new format and see how we go:
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
I'd say he does a lot better than CNN and Fox, and @NaffNaffBobFace is not even a journalist and doesn't pretend to be.
If you continue, and I hope you do - might I suggest just doing so as you please, and not the way anyone else tells you to until told otherwise by @Montoya.
Thanks for the kind feedback, the guardian one isnt subscriber it's just a news feed of the days happenings.
Your headlines are not the point I was attempting to make. It's more a comment about what gets included not how it's worded.
Without a doubt, it's been my first stop in the morning even before google news.
Hopefully, it's always as he pleases. I was not questioning the accuracy of the story more the reason behind why these stories were being shared. And filtering is more than just the summarizing of the headline/content but also what stories are and are not shared. After all, there is power in the sharing of knowledge and the ability to craft a narrative that can be both helpful and harmful. A tool that has become very real and very polarizing in lots of mainstream media companies recently (not that it's a new development as the sharing of stories has always been a tool to inform and to control) and so it does come back to what do you wish to accomplish. Are you attempting to be as neutral as possible are you attempting to shape or are you but a repeater ignorant to the crafted narrative from which you derive your worldview? There is no real right answer to the question more what are you comfortable with and capable of providing an answer to the question, why these stories why include a story on a Dr who lies about the state of a hospital? Is it because he states a fact that a doctor states taking horse dewormer and its risks is worth sharing even if his alarm about the outcome is fabricated if not believable by those who wish it to be true while decisive by those who should heed the warning? For they are not going to see Dr warns against taking horse dewormer as its unsafe, instead they are going to see lying doctor tries to scare people from taking horse dewormer and end up reinforcing their mistrust of the scientific community. While the other side is going to see dumb people take horse dewormer and flood overcrowded hospital ER. It is this that I questioned why include it when the more important part was a warning about the inherent risks with self-medicating especially of packaged medicine not meant to be administered to humans and any doctor would be a great source on that. Be careful of the narrative you wish to convey for you have the intelligence to shape it however you choose.
He's sharing the stories that interest him and his opinion about them. The word "catharsis" is even in the title he uses. If you don't know what that means, look it up. A dictionary is helpful, but also check Wikipedia, there's an excellent description there including it's history which adds some context to the dictionary definition.
A bit condescending don't you think? And while this is a gamer forum within it is far more than topics related to Star Citizen or games in general especially given that this thread is in the forum marked off-topic. Nor did I say NaffNaffBobFace is posting a news feed, the question originally was a question on the subject of his posting and specifically why that heading? While did change it just recently to a news feed of sorts and thus the change in questions the original was well within the bounds of asking about the personal reasons for sharing.
Sorry if that seemed condescending, the word catharsis is in the forum posts. That has certain connotations that appear to be being missed. See second sentence below.
So your question was on his personal reasons for sharing. It is actually a kind of art form. I was kind of hoping that you looked it up on Wikipedia.
www.theguardian.com
Throw in Epoch Times as well!
www.theguardian.com
The amount of pearl-clutching going on in that subreddit (sort by Controversial) is just astounding.
The whole Ivermectin business makes no sense to me. It's an anti-parasitic drug to treat well....parasites. COVID19 is a VIRUS.
I agree and in fact yesterday CNN ran a story that while some people might be taking Ivermectin or asking to take it, the truth is that the local news agency crafted a very misleading story.
www.cnn.com
As I said earlier I was not even sure how this was news.
