It's like saying I have a bulletproof car but never get shot at, in fact, your car would be worse off than a standard compact car due to the extra weight as both cars are effective at stopping zero bullets. So saying that the masks are the reason you are not sick when there has been no virus present is not testing anything.
An interesting analogy however it's flawed - The masks are not to stop the bullets coming
into the car although they can help, they are to stop the bullets coming
out of the car. Having a mask on is akin to trying to perform a drive-by without rolling the window down.
If I were to continue your bulletproof car analogy under the assumption it is purely to stop bullets getting in, though - You don't know if the bullets are coming, but they are whizzing around you thick and fast - you might hear one has hit someone else nearby so you put your foot down and get it up to 70mph in a 30 zone... but then loose control on a curve and slam into a tree. You are not wearing a seat-belt and become a greasy red streak across the dashboard.
You need to drive your your bulletproof car (mask for personal defense) you keep the windows up (mask for defense of others), you obey the speed limits (social distancing and group sizes) and put on your seat belt (wash your hands and don't touch your face). Only
a combination of measures are going to provide a comprehensive set of defenses.
You may still not be totally safe but you will have done as much as you can to limit your exposure to the virus. Science currently suggests lower load exposure, a higher chance of survival if you do contract it, if it fails to stop the virus the chances are higher that you'll have a lower severity of infection.
New CDC Study Finds Majority of Those Infected with COVID-19 ‘Always’ Wore Masks
californiaglobe.com
Weird article.
It's all "Arse about face" as we say in my country (backwards).
The headline suggests people get sick despite 'Always' wearing masks, lists a bunch of low-level inconveniences about wearing them, then goes on to question the "efficacy of wearing masks to prevent contracting the Coronavirus"...
In the words of Chris Roberts "And we're like, yeah no shit, we know..."
We know masks are not a comprehensive defense against
contracting it. But we also know they are much more effective at stopping people from spreading it
further, which the article goes on to admit: "...CDC says “cloth face coverings help prevent people who have COVID-19 from spreading the virus to others”...
It then goes on to say "Interestingly, the CDC found: Adults with confirmed COVID-19 (case-patients) were approximately twice as likely as were control-participants to have reported dining at a restaurant in the 14 days before becoming ill." A restaurant, a place where you cannot
always wear a mask if you intend to eat...? So did they always wear a mask... or didn't they...?
This article has a bunch of information, even more contradictions, but no actual conclusions? What's it trying to
say?